Daniel G. Calder

542 total citations
14 papers, 158 citations indexed

About

Daniel G. Calder is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel G. Calder has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 158 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Classics, 6 papers in Language and Linguistics and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Daniel G. Calder's work include Medieval Literature and History (11 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (6 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper). Daniel G. Calder is often cited by papers focused on Medieval Literature and History (11 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (6 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper). Daniel G. Calder collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel G. Calder's co-authors include Stanley B. Greenfield, John C. Pope, Michael J. Allen, Jonathan Cross and E. G. Stanley and has published in prestigious journals such as Modern Language Journal, The Modern Language Review and Comparative Literature.

In The Last Decade

Daniel G. Calder

10 papers receiving 104 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel G. Calder United States 5 104 52 51 25 15 14 158
Thomas D. Hill United States 6 121 1.2× 61 1.2× 46 0.9× 20 0.8× 31 2.1× 66 163
Hugh Magennis United Kingdom 9 162 1.6× 77 1.5× 83 1.6× 29 1.2× 25 1.7× 32 209
Martin Irvine United States 5 76 0.7× 30 0.6× 35 0.7× 14 0.6× 23 1.5× 10 123
Michael W. Herren Canada 6 76 0.7× 52 1.0× 40 0.8× 9 0.4× 17 1.1× 31 119
M. C. Seymour United Kingdom 6 101 1.0× 73 1.4× 29 0.6× 26 1.0× 13 0.9× 24 149
Thomas Malory 6 123 1.2× 92 1.8× 35 0.7× 74 3.0× 14 0.9× 30 214
Glyn S. Burgess Australia 7 81 0.8× 42 0.8× 40 0.8× 37 1.5× 26 1.7× 37 149
Ronald Waldron United Kingdom 7 141 1.4× 76 1.5× 45 0.9× 36 1.4× 24 1.6× 21 188
Roger Sherman Loomis United States 6 99 1.0× 71 1.4× 21 0.4× 38 1.5× 14 0.9× 21 156
Eugène Vinaver 5 125 1.2× 78 1.5× 35 0.7× 72 2.9× 15 1.0× 13 201

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Calder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Calder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Calder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Calder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Calder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Calder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Calder. The network helps show where Daniel G. Calder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel G. Calder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel G. Calder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel G. Calder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel G. Calder. Daniel G. Calder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Greenfield, Stanley B. & Daniel G. Calder. (2020). A New Critical History of Old English Literature. New York University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
2.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1989). English Literature before Chaucer. Michael Swanton. Speculum. 64(3). 769–771. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pope, John C., Stanley B. Greenfield, & Daniel G. Calder. (1988). A New Critical History of Old English Literature. The Modern Language Review. 83(3). 660–660. 60 indexed citations
4.
Greenfield, Stanley B., et al.. (1988). A New Critical History of Old English Literature. Comparative Literature. 40(3). 286–286. 23 indexed citations
5.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1987). The Ages of Man: A Study in Medieval Writing and Thought. Modern Language Quarterly. 48(4). 386–388. 25 indexed citations
6.
Stanley, E. G., et al.. (1987). Sources and Analogues of Old English Poetry, II: The Major Germanic and Celtic Texts in Translation. The Modern Language Review. 82(2). 432–432. 1 indexed citations
7.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1981). Histories and surveys of Old English literature: a chronological review. Anglo-Saxon England. 10. 201–244. 3 indexed citations
8.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1979). Old English poetry : essays on style. University of California Press eBooks. 20 indexed citations
9.
Cross, Jonathan, Michael J. Allen, & Daniel G. Calder. (1979). Sources and Analogues of Old English Poetry: The Major Latin Texts in Translation. The Yearbook of English Studies. 9. 359–359. 4 indexed citations
10.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1978). The Bible in Early English Literature. Modern Language Quarterly. 39(1). 71–73.
11.
Allen, Michael J. & Daniel G. Calder. (1977). Sources and Analogues of Old English Poetry: The Major Latin Texts in Translation. Modern Language Journal. 61(4). 200–200. 12 indexed citations
12.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1973). The Art of Cynewulf's Juliana. Modern Language Quarterly. 34(4). 355–371. 4 indexed citations
13.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1972). The vision of paradise: a symbolic reading of the Old EnglishPhoenix. Anglo-Saxon England. 1. 167–181. 1 indexed citations
14.
Calder, Daniel G.. (1972). Strife, revelation, and conversion: The thematic structure ofElene. English Studies. 53(3). 201–210. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026