Thomas Bloor

1.6k citations
10 papers · 701 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Bloor

10 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

Thomas Bloor
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Literature and Literary Theory 345
  • Language and Linguistics 283
  • Linguistics and Language 75
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 122
  • Human-Computer Interaction 39
Replace Meriel Bloor with:
Meriel Bloor United Kingdom
Paul Garrett United States
Priyanvada Abeywickrama United States
David Pimm Canada
Dawn Archer United Kingdom
Pam Peters Australia
John Macalister New Zealand
Polly Tse Hong Kong
Grant Henning United States
Marissa Rollnick South Africa
Thomas Bloor relative to Meriel Bloor United Kingdom Meriel Bloor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Meriel Bloor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bloor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bloor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bloor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bloor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bloor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bloor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bloor. The network helps show where Thomas Bloor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bloor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bloor Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bloor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2004209
2 1998143
3 2013143
4 201393
5 201345
6
What Do Language Students Know About Grammar
198626
7
Playing Safe with Predictions: Hedging, Attribution and Conditions in Economic Forecasting.
198719
8 199618
9
Languages for Specific Purposes: Practice and Theory. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 19.
19863
10 19792

About Thomas Bloor

Thomas Bloor is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Political Science and International Relations, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), African history and culture analysis (1 paper), Multilingual Education and Policy (1 paper), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (345 citations), Language and Linguistics (283 citations), Linguistics and Language (75 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (122 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (39 citations). Thomas Bloor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Meriel Bloor, Neil Anderson and Wondwosen Tamrat. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Modern Language Journal and English in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact