Thomas Apperley

32 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

Thomas Apperley
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 222
  • Literature and Literary Theory 131
  • Human-Computer Interaction 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 428
  • Computer Science Applications 40
Replace Susana Tosca with:
Susana Tosca Denmark
Pedro F. Hernández-Ramos United States
Jonas Heide Smith Denmark
Joost Raessens Netherlands
Simon Egenfeldt‐Nielsen Denmark
Frederik De Grove Belgium
Jeroen Bourgonjon Belgium
Hui‐Yin Hsu United States
Hans Christian Arnseth Norway
Shiang‐Kwei Wang United States
Thomas Apperley relative to Susana Tosca Denmark Susana Tosca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Susana Tosca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Apperley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Apperley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Apperley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Apperley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Apperley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Apperley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Apperley. The network helps show where Thomas Apperley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Apperley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Apperley Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Apperley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006294
2 201151
3 201550
4 201250
5 201924
6 200923
7
Gaming capital: Rethinking literacy
200919
8 201817
9 201014
10 201813
11
'Turning Around' to the Affordances of Digital Games: English Curriculum and Students' Lifeworlds
201512
12 201812
13 201311
14 20168
15 20076
16
Researching digital game players : gameplay and gaming capital
20086
17 20165
18
Eurocentric values at play: modding the colonial from the Indigenous perspective
20195
19 20184
20
Using gaming paratexts in the literacy classroom
20124

About Thomas Apperley

Thomas Apperley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 33 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (23 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (7 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (3 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (222 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (131 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (66 citations), Sociology and Political Science (428 citations) and Computer Science Applications (40 citations). Thomas Apperley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Finland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Christopher S. Walsh, Catherine Beavis, Jussi Parikka, Justin Clemens, Clare Bradford, Joanne O’Mara, Bjørn Nansen, Lars De Wildt, Souvik Mukherjee and Thomas Birtchnell. Their work appears in journals such as Games and Culture, The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, Literacy, Communication Research and Practice and Open Library of Humanities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact