Thom Erdle

536 citations
21 papers · 433 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thom Erdle

20 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Thom Erdle
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 209
  • Global and Planetary Change 349
  • Insect Science 141
  • Ecology 169
  • Environmental Engineering 88
Replace John M. Goodburn with:
John M. Goodburn United States
Douglas N. Kastendick United States
Dietmar Jäger Austria
C. B. Edminster United States
Tarja Tuomainen Finland
GEMMA WOLDENDORP Australia
H. C. Thorpe Canada
Bernt‐Håvard Øyen Norway
Gary E. Dixon United States
Lu YuanChang China
Thom Erdle relative to John M. Goodburn United States John M. Goodburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
John M. Goodburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thom Erdle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thom Erdle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thom Erdle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thom Erdle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thom Erdle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thom Erdle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thom Erdle. The network helps show where Thom Erdle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Thom Erdle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thom Erdle Line = papers co-authored together Thom Erdle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200179
2 199178
3 199968
4 201328
5 199825
6 199823
7 201322
8 200219
9 201214
10 201514
11 199911
12 199810
13 19849
14 20139
15 20058
16 20057
17 20114
18 19812
19 19892
20 20081

About Thom Erdle

Thom Erdle is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Mechanics of Materials and Environmental Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (12 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers), Forest ecology and management (8 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (5 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (4 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (209 citations), Global and Planetary Change (349 citations), Insect Science (141 citations), Ecology (169 citations) and Environmental Engineering (88 citations). Thom Erdle has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include David A. MacLean, F.J. Ahern, Hamish Kimmins, Wayne E. MacKinnon, Kevin B. Porter, Muhammad Irfan Ashraf, Charles P.‐A. Bourque, Fan‐Rui Meng, Chris R. Hennigar and G. W. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as The Forestry Chronicle, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Canadian Public Policy, International Journal of Remote Sensing and Journal of Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact