Douglas N. Kastendick

540 total citations
18 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

Douglas N. Kastendick is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Douglas N. Kastendick has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 14 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 8 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Douglas N. Kastendick's work include Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Forest ecology and management (6 papers). Douglas N. Kastendick is often cited by papers focused on Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Forest ecology and management (6 papers). Douglas N. Kastendick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Switzerland. Douglas N. Kastendick's co-authors include Brian J. Palik, John B. Bradford, Christopher W. Woodall, Mark E. Harmon, Becky Fasth, Joachim Rock, Anthony W. D’Amato, Shawn Fraver, Christopher E. Looney and Eric K. Zenner and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Ecological Applications and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Douglas N. Kastendick

17 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Douglas N. Kastendick United States 11 259 208 149 112 59 18 393
Franka Huth Germany 11 221 0.9× 259 1.2× 107 0.7× 79 0.7× 88 1.5× 21 405
Armando Torres‐Lezama Venezuela 8 304 1.2× 353 1.7× 161 1.1× 83 0.7× 66 1.1× 16 538
Duncan S. Wilson United States 13 351 1.4× 341 1.6× 151 1.0× 124 1.1× 56 0.9× 21 513
Magda Jonášová Czechia 7 220 0.8× 180 0.9× 213 1.4× 207 1.8× 90 1.5× 7 438
Jens Peter Skovsgaard Sweden 5 156 0.6× 173 0.8× 101 0.7× 72 0.6× 60 1.0× 10 321
Anna Gazda Poland 12 192 0.7× 284 1.4× 123 0.8× 123 1.1× 101 1.7× 42 455
GEMMA WOLDENDORP Australia 6 232 0.9× 151 0.7× 177 1.2× 104 0.9× 72 1.2× 8 410
Kim Whitford Australia 10 207 0.8× 264 1.3× 75 0.5× 202 1.8× 72 1.2× 14 440
Julius Sebald Austria 6 336 1.3× 251 1.2× 141 0.9× 158 1.4× 53 0.9× 6 503
Jonas Glatthorn Germany 13 203 0.8× 265 1.3× 148 1.0× 112 1.0× 55 0.9× 26 420

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas N. Kastendick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas N. Kastendick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas N. Kastendick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas N. Kastendick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas N. Kastendick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas N. Kastendick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas N. Kastendick. The network helps show where Douglas N. Kastendick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas N. Kastendick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas N. Kastendick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas N. Kastendick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas N. Kastendick. Douglas N. Kastendick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Palik, Brian J., et al.. (2024). Comparing performance of assisted migration seed sources of two oak species in a Minnesota red pine woodland. New Forests. 55(6). 1875–1885. 2 indexed citations
2.
Palik, Brian J. & Douglas N. Kastendick. (2023). Restoration of woody plant communities in red pine plantations on abandoned agricultural land in northern Minnesota, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 541. 121095–121095. 2 indexed citations
4.
Palik, Brian J., et al.. (2021). Eighth-year survival and growth of planted replacement tree species in black ash (Fraxinus nigra) wetlands threatened by emerald ash borer in Minnesota, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 484. 118958–118958. 17 indexed citations
5.
Bravo‐Oviedo, Andrés, Douglas N. Kastendick, Icíar Alberdi, & Christopher W. Woodall. (2021). Similar tree species richness-productivity response but differing effects on carbon stocks and timber production in eastern US and continental Spain. The Science of The Total Environment. 793. 148399–148399. 8 indexed citations
6.
Harmon, Mark E., et al.. (2020). Release of coarse woody detritus-related carbon: a synthesis across forest biomes. Carbon Balance and Management. 15(1). 1–1. 100 indexed citations
7.
Bottero, Alessandra, et al.. (2019). Managing red pine stand structure to mitigate drought impacts. Dendrochronologia. 57. 125623–125623. 19 indexed citations
8.
Russell, Matthew B., et al.. (2019). Short- and Long-Term Results of Alternative Silviculture in Peatland Black Spruce in Minnesota, USA. Forest Science. 66(2). 256–265. 9 indexed citations
9.
Looney, Christopher E., Anthony W. D’Amato, Brian J. Palik, Shawn Fraver, & Douglas N. Kastendick. (2018). Size-growth relationship, tree spatial patterns, and tree-tree competition influence tree growth and stand complexity in a 160-year red pine chronosequence. Forest Ecology and Management. 424. 85–94. 24 indexed citations
11.
Young, Brian, Anthony W. D’Amato, Christel C. Kern, Douglas N. Kastendick, & Brian J. Palik. (2017). Seven decades of change in forest structure and composition in Pinus resinosa forests in northern Minnesota, USA: Comparing managed and unmanaged conditions. Forest Ecology and Management. 395. 92–103. 13 indexed citations
12.
Kastendick, Douglas N., et al.. (2014). Regeneration Responses in Partially-Harvested Riparian Management Zones in Northern Minnesota. Journal of Water Resource and Protection. 6(6). 556–564. 2 indexed citations
13.
Kastendick, Douglas N., Eric K. Zenner, Brian J. Palik, Randall K. Kolka, & Charles R. Blinn. (2012). Effects of harvesting on nitrogen and phosphorus availability in riparian management zone soils in Minnesota, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 42(10). 1784–1791. 11 indexed citations
14.
Zenner, Eric K., et al.. (2012). Riparian vegetation response to gradients in residual basal area with harvesting treatment and distance to stream. Forest Ecology and Management. 283. 66–76. 19 indexed citations
15.
Fraver, Shawn, Theresa B. Jain, John B. Bradford, et al.. (2011). The efficacy of salvage logging in reducing subsequent fire severity in conifer-dominated forests of Minnesota, USA. Ecological Applications. 21(6). 1895–1901. 41 indexed citations
16.
Palik, Brian J. & Douglas N. Kastendick. (2010). Response of seasonal pond plant communities to upland forest harvest in northern Minnesota forests, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 260(5). 628–637. 14 indexed citations
17.
Bradford, John B. & Douglas N. Kastendick. (2010). Age-related patterns of forest complexity and carbon storage in pine and aspen–birch ecosystems of northern Minnesota, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 40(3). 401–409. 80 indexed citations
18.
Palik, Brian J. & Douglas N. Kastendick. (2009). Woody plant regeneration after blowdown, salvage logging, and prescribed fire in a northern Minnesota forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 258(7). 1323–1330. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026