Thérèse van Elderen

1.6k citations
22 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 16

Thérèse van Elderen

22 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thérèse van Elderen
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 740
  • General Health Professions 371
  • Social Psychology 226
  • Clinical Psychology 208
  • Applied Psychology 111
Replace Biing‐Jiun Shen with:
Biing‐Jiun Shen United States
Ruud A.M. Erdman Netherlands
Lesley Stafford Australia
Marja‐Leena Kristofferzon Sweden
Zachary M. Shnek Canada
Marc Huber United States
Oskar Mittag Germany
Mary Gutmann United States
Julija Brožaitienė Lithuania
Kurt Fritzsche Germany
Thérèse van Elderen relative to Biing‐Jiun Shen United States Biing‐Jiun Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Biing‐Jiun Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thérèse van Elderen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thérèse van Elderen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thérèse van Elderen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thérèse van Elderen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thérèse van Elderen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thérèse van Elderen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thérèse van Elderen. The network helps show where Thérèse van Elderen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thérèse van Elderen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thérèse van Elderen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thérèse van Elderen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thérèse van Elderen. Thérèse van Elderen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 14
2 34
3 40
4 97
5 42
6 40
7 28
8 9
9 57
10 81
11 24
12 12
13 328
14 41
15 278
16 15
17 32
18 18
19 17
20
Quality of life in patients with cancer, CNSLD, coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus: a review of research in The Netherlands
2

About Thérèse van Elderen

Thérèse van Elderen is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (13 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (740 citations), Applied Psychology (111 citations) and General Health Professions (371 citations). Thérèse van Elderen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stan Maes, Elise Dusseldorp, Vivian Kraaij, Jacqueline J. Meulman, Karlein M. G. Schreurs, Katherine Joekes, Véronique De Gucht, Denise T. D. de Ridder, Vivian T. Colland and Roeline G. Kuijer. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Health Psychology and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026