S. van Dooren

797 total citations
16 papers, 611 citations indexed

About

S. van Dooren is a scholar working on Genetics, Oncology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, S. van Dooren has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 611 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Genetics, 12 papers in Oncology and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in S. van Dooren's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (13 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Family Support in Illness (9 papers). S. van Dooren is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (13 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Family Support in Illness (9 papers). S. van Dooren collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. S. van Dooren's co-authors include Carin C.D. van der Rijt, Wendy H. Oldenmenger, Caroline Seynaeve, Peter A.E. Sillevis Smitt, G. Stoter, Aad Tibben, Adriana J. Rijnsburger, Harry J. de Koning, Marie‐Louise Essink‐Bot and Hugo J. Duivenvoorden and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

In The Last Decade

S. van Dooren

15 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. van Dooren Netherlands 13 254 221 177 170 167 16 611
Jennifer Hilgart United Kingdom 13 239 0.9× 81 0.4× 186 1.1× 145 0.9× 67 0.4× 18 618
Leslie G. Bluman United States 8 198 0.8× 150 0.7× 60 0.3× 52 0.3× 71 0.4× 8 625
Toni Musiello Australia 14 73 0.3× 188 0.9× 132 0.7× 64 0.4× 97 0.6× 24 434
Keith Richardson Canada 16 45 0.2× 183 0.8× 52 0.3× 31 0.2× 66 0.4× 57 620
Thomas Hakes United States 6 27 0.1× 205 0.9× 126 0.7× 49 0.3× 62 0.4× 6 402
Jennifer Wong United States 8 95 0.4× 76 0.3× 45 0.3× 45 0.3× 11 0.1× 32 421
Davinia Seah Australia 12 37 0.1× 245 1.1× 80 0.5× 12 0.1× 48 0.3× 24 473
Anna Jervaeus Sweden 15 96 0.4× 397 1.8× 204 1.2× 7 0.0× 134 0.8× 29 686
Jennifer Wiernikowski Canada 9 11 0.0× 425 1.9× 159 0.9× 34 0.2× 126 0.8× 11 631
Rola Hamood Israel 9 24 0.1× 161 0.7× 48 0.3× 60 0.4× 24 0.1× 9 354

Countries citing papers authored by S. van Dooren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. van Dooren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. van Dooren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. van Dooren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. van Dooren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. van Dooren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. van Dooren. The network helps show where S. van Dooren may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. van Dooren

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. van Dooren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. van Dooren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. van Dooren. S. van Dooren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Vanheusden, Kathleen, Caroline Seynaeve, Hugo J. Duivenvoorden, et al.. (2010). Distress in partners of high-risk women undergoing breast cancer surveillance. Journal of Men s Health. 7(4). 413–419. 1 indexed citations
2.
Oldenmenger, Wendy H., Peter A.E. Sillevis Smitt, S. van Dooren, G. Stoter, & Carin C.D. van der Rijt. (2009). A systematic review on barriers hindering adequate cancer pain management and interventions to reduce them: A critical appraisal. European Journal of Cancer. 45(8). 1370–1380. 196 indexed citations
3.
Bleiker, Eveline M. A., Marian B. E. Menke‐Pluymers, Arthur R. Van Gool, et al.. (2009). Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice. 7(1). 6–6. 20 indexed citations
4.
Dooren, S. van, et al.. (2009). Exploration of Concerns of Relatives During Continuous Palliative Sedation of Their Family Members with Cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 38(3). 452–459. 29 indexed citations
5.
Dooren, S. van, H.J. Duivenvoorden, Jan Passchier, et al.. (2009). The Distress Thermometer assessed in women at risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 18(10). 1080–1087. 13 indexed citations
6.
Dooren, S. van, Caroline Seynaeve, C.C.M. Bartels, et al.. (2007). Passive coping and psychological distress in women adhering to regular breast cancer surveillance. Psycho-Oncology. 16(9). 851–858. 34 indexed citations
7.
Seynaeve, Caroline, Arthur R. Van Gool, Martinus F. Niermeijer, et al.. (2006). The course of distress in women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer due to an (identified) genetic susceptibility who opt for prophylactic mastectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy. European Journal of Cancer. 43(1). 95–103. 51 indexed citations
8.
Oostrom, Iris van, Hanne Meijers‐Heijboer, Hugo J. Duivenvoorden, et al.. (2006). A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psycho-Oncology. 16(4). 320–328. 47 indexed citations
9.
Essink‐Bot, Marie‐Louise, Adriana J. Rijnsburger, S. van Dooren, Harry J. de Koning, & Caroline Seynaeve. (2006). Women's acceptance of MRI in breast cancer surveillance because of a familial or genetic predisposition. The Breast. 15(5). 673–676. 28 indexed citations
10.
Dooren, S. van, C. Seynaeve, C.C.M. Bartels, et al.. (2006). The psychological impact of regular surveillance in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Supplements. 4(2). 88–89. 1 indexed citations
11.
Dooren, S. van, Caroline Seynaeve, Adriana J. Rijnsburger, et al.. (2005). Exploring the course of psychological distress around two successive control visits in women at hereditary risk of breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 41(10). 1416–1425. 27 indexed citations
12.
Dooren, S. van, Caroline Seynaeve, Adriana J. Rijnsburger, et al.. (2005). The impact of having relatives affected with breast cancer on psychological distress in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 89(1). 75–80. 24 indexed citations
13.
Dooren, S. van. (2005). The Psychological Impact of Regular Surveillance in Women at Increased Risk for hereditary Breast Cancer: a clinical empirical exploration. 1 indexed citations
14.
Rijnsburger, Adriana J., Marie‐Louise Essink‐Bot, S. van Dooren, et al.. (2004). Impact of screening for breast cancer in high-risk women on health-related quality of life. British Journal of Cancer. 91(1). 69–76. 60 indexed citations
15.
Dooren, S. van, Adriana J. Rijnsburger, Caroline Seynaeve, et al.. (2004). Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception. European Journal of Cancer. 40(14). 2056–2063. 52 indexed citations
16.
Dooren, S. van, Adriana J. Rijnsburger, Caroline Seynaeve, et al.. (2003). Psychological Distress and Breast Self-Examination Frequency in Women at Increased Risk for Hereditary or Familial Breast Cancer. Public Health Genomics. 6(4). 235–241. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026