Theo Schofield
- Family Practice top 2%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 11
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 7
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 4
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Obesity and Health Practices 3
- Medical Terminology top 10%
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 4
- Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention 4
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 2
-
- Empathy and Medical Education 5
Theo Schofield
27 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Family Practice 137
- General Health Professions 895
- Pharmacy 87
- Medical Terminology 4
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 445
Countries citing papers authored by Theo Schofield
This map shows the geographic impact of Theo Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo Schofield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theo Schofield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo Schofield. The network helps show where Theo Schofield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theo Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 45 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 96 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 83 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 143 | |
| 6 | The New Consultation: Developing doctor-patient communication | 2003 | 71 |
| 7 | 2002 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 9 | An assessment of morbidity registers for coronary heart disease in primary care. ASSIST (ASSessment of Implementation STrategy) trial collaborative group. | 2000 | 20 |
| 10 | 1999 | 137 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 301 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 14 | Continuing care : the management of chronic disease | 1990 | 4 |
| 15 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 18 | The relationship between the college and the pharmaceutical industry. | 1983 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 46 |
About Theo Schofield
Theo Schofield is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (137 citations), General Health Professions (895 citations), Pharmacy (87 citations), Medical Terminology (4 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (445 citations). Theo Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Gregory Makoul, Sarah Ford, Tony Hope, Paul Arntson, David Pendleton, Peter Tate, Angela Coulter, John Hasler, Richard L. Street and Donald J. Cegala. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Health Expectations, Health Communication, Social Science & Medicine and Family Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.