Sarah Ford

2.3k total citations
31 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Sarah Ford is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Building and Construction and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Ford has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Building and Construction and 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Sarah Ford's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (13 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (7 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers). Sarah Ford is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (13 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (7 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers). Sarah Ford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Australia. Sarah Ford's co-authors include Lesley Fallowfield, Shôn Lewis, Theo Schofield, Tony Hope, Angela Hall, Dean Smith, Patrick McHugh, E.S. Newlands, Anne‐Marie Slowther and Gordon Rustin and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, British Journal of Cancer and Acta Biomaterialia.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Ford

29 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Ford United Kingdom 18 1.1k 625 352 243 222 31 1.6k
Nigel R Armfield Australia 24 672 0.6× 1.0k 1.7× 184 0.5× 94 0.4× 255 1.1× 85 1.9k
Theresa Wiseman United Kingdom 19 360 0.3× 312 0.5× 427 1.2× 115 0.5× 242 1.1× 66 1.3k
Freda Mold United Kingdom 17 587 0.5× 483 0.8× 191 0.5× 167 0.7× 62 0.3× 38 1.4k
Annemieke Bikker United Kingdom 16 933 0.8× 747 1.2× 212 0.6× 205 0.8× 24 0.1× 33 1.6k
Annette De Vito Dabbs United States 13 353 0.3× 306 0.5× 140 0.4× 257 1.1× 135 0.6× 27 1.7k
Dori Pekmezi United States 27 834 0.8× 798 1.3× 335 1.0× 61 0.3× 206 0.9× 99 2.1k
Nicol Nijland Netherlands 10 1.1k 1.0× 367 0.6× 68 0.2× 60 0.2× 50 0.2× 19 1.8k
Elin Børøsund Norway 17 500 0.5× 261 0.4× 334 0.9× 41 0.2× 126 0.6× 49 1.0k
Alain Deccache Belgium 14 740 0.7× 181 0.3× 47 0.1× 109 0.4× 126 0.6× 56 1.3k
Elisabeth Coyne Australia 20 342 0.3× 429 0.7× 183 0.5× 43 0.2× 167 0.8× 74 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Ford. The network helps show where Sarah Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Ford. Sarah Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ford, Sarah, et al.. (2025). Fluorescent mapping of osteocyte-driven bone formation at pre-osteocyte and mature osteocyte lacunae. Acta Biomaterialia. 207. 444–455.
2.
Mekonen, Tesfa, Sarah Ford, Gary Chan, et al.. (2021). What is the short-term remission rate for people with untreated depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 296. 17–25. 24 indexed citations
4.
Ford, Sarah, Theo Schofield, & Tony Hope. (2006). Observing decision‐making in the general practice consultation: who makes which decisions?. Health Expectations. 9(2). 130–137. 45 indexed citations
5.
Ford, Sarah. (2004). Patient‐centered Medicine, Transforming the Clinical Method (2nd edition). Health Expectations. 7(2). 181–182. 25 indexed citations
6.
Ford, Sarah & Angela Hall. (2004). Communication behaviours of skilled and less skilled oncologists: a validation study of the Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS). Patient Education and Counseling. 54(3). 275–282. 18 indexed citations
7.
Slowther, Anne‐Marie, Sarah Ford, & Theo Schofield. (2004). Ethics of evidence based medicine in the primary care setting. Journal of Medical Ethics. 30(2). 151–155. 31 indexed citations
8.
Ford, Sarah, Theo Schofield, & Tony Hope. (2003). Are patients' decision‐making preferences being met?. Health Expectations. 6(1). 72–80. 96 indexed citations
9.
Ford, Sarah, Theo Schofield, & Tony Hope. (2003). What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based patient choice consultation?: A qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine. 56(3). 589–602. 143 indexed citations
10.
Allen, Judith, et al.. (2002). Health Care Communication Using Personality Type: Patients are Different!. Health Expectations. 5(2). 182–183. 20 indexed citations
11.
Ford, Sarah, Theo Schofield, & Tony Hope. (2002). Barriers to the evidence-based patient choice (EBPC) consultation. Patient Education and Counseling. 47(2). 179–185. 39 indexed citations
12.
Ford, Sarah, et al.. (2000). The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): an instrument for analysing interviews of oncologists and patients with cancer. Social Science & Medicine. 50(4). 553–566. 101 indexed citations
13.
Ford, Sarah, et al.. (1999). The virtual theorypractice gap. Journal of Child Health Care. 3(2). 36–38. 4 indexed citations
14.
Ford, Sarah, Lesley Fallowfield, & Shôn Lewis. (1996). Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Social Science & Medicine. 42(11). 1511–1519. 343 indexed citations
15.
McHugh, Patrick, Shôn Lewis, Sarah Ford, et al.. (1995). The efficacy of audiotapes in promoting psychological well-being in cancer patients: a randomised, controlled trial. British Journal of Cancer. 71(2). 388–392. 88 indexed citations
16.
Ford, Sarah, Shôn Lewis, & Lesley Fallowfield. (1995). Psychological morbidity in newly referred patients with cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 39(2). 193–202. 86 indexed citations
17.
Ford, Sarah, Lesley Fallowfield, Angela Hall, & Shôn Lewis. (1995). The influence of audiotapes on patient participation in the cancer consultation. European Journal of Cancer. 31(13-14). 2264–2269. 67 indexed citations
18.
Gebremedhin, Tesfaye Alemayehu, et al.. (1994). Abstracts of Organized Symposia and Selected Papers. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 23(2). 242–252.
19.
Ford, Sarah, Lesley Fallowfield, & Shôn Lewis. (1994). Can oncologists detect distress in their out-patients and how satisfied are they with their performance during bad news consultations?. British Journal of Cancer. 70(4). 767–770. 200 indexed citations
20.
Aouad, Ghassan, Peter Brandon, Frank Edward Brown, et al.. (1993). Information modelling in the construction industry: The information engineering approach. Construction Management and Economics. 11(5). 384–397. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026