Theo Bothma

1.0k citations
89 papers · 622 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Theo Bothma

77 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Theo Bothma
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Library and Information Sciences 121
  • Language and Linguistics 160
  • Information Systems 174
  • Information Systems and Management 48
  • Communication 47
Replace Bernd Frohmann with:
Bernd Frohmann Canada
Terry Crowley New Zealand
Jeffrey Pomerantz United States
Hanne Albrechtsen United States
Helen R. Tibbo United States
Ali Shiri Canada
Christopher S. G. Khoo Singapore
Lyn Pemberton United Kingdom
Barbara H. Kwaśnik United States
Terrence A. Brooks United States
Theo Bothma relative to Bernd Frohmann Canada Bernd Frohmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Bernd Frohmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Theo Bothma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theo Bothma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo Bothma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo Bothma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theo Bothma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo Bothma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo Bothma. The network helps show where Theo Bothma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theo Bothma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Theo Bothma Line = papers co-authored together Theo Bothma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200768
2 201226
3 198125
4 201821
5 198120
6 200619
7 200318
8 201217
9 201816
10 201215
11 200715
12 201214
13 201314
14 200513
15 201212
16
Interactive, dynamic electronic dictionaries for text production
201111
17
Trends in transition from classical censorship to Internet censorship : selected country overviews
201311
18 201511
19
An Assessment of the Changing Needs of Information Professionals in Zimbabwe
201410
20 201110

About Theo Bothma

Theo Bothma is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 89 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lexicography and Language Studies (20 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (17 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers), Library Science and Administration (7 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (7 papers) and Web and Library Services (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (121 citations), Language and Linguistics (160 citations), Information Systems (174 citations), Information Systems and Management (48 citations) and Communication (47 citations). Theo Bothma has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dennis N. Ocholla, Henning Bergenholtz, Ina Fourie, Ulrich Heid, De Beer, Rufus H. Gouws, J. N. COETZEE, R. W. Hedges, Sven Tarp and David Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as Library Hi Tech, Microbiology, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, Libri and Education for Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact