Countries where authors publish in Education for Information
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Education for Information. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Education for Information with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Education for Information more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Education for Information
This network shows the impact of papers published in Education for Information. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Education for Information.
About Education for Information
The 666 papers published in Education for Information in the last decades have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Education for Information usually cover Library and Information Sciences (220 papers), Computer Science Applications (79 papers), Conservation (36 papers), Information Systems (176 papers) and Education (176 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (201 papers), Library Science and Administration (97 papers), Web and Library Services (90 papers), Online and Blended Learning (77 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (43 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (34 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (24 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Education for Information are Andrew K. Shenton, Quan Nha Hong, Isabelle Vedel, Alicia O’Cathain, Pierre Dagenais, Pierre Pluye, Sergi Fàbregues, Frances Griffiths, Belinda Nicolau and Margaret Cargo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.