Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social Learning and Water Resources Management
2007921 citationsClaudia Pahl‐Wostl, Marc Craps et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Tharsi Taillieu
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tharsi Taillieu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tharsi Taillieu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tharsi Taillieu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tharsi Taillieu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tharsi Taillieu. The network helps show where Tharsi Taillieu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tharsi Taillieu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tharsi Taillieu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tharsi Taillieu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tharsi Taillieu. Tharsi Taillieu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lambrechts, Frank, et al.. (2009). Virtual Organizations as Temporary Organizational Networks : Boundary Blurring, Dilemmas, Career Characteristics and Leadership. Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt). 22(1). 55–81.3 indexed citations
7.
Dewulf, Art, Marcela Brugnach, Nicola Isendahl, et al.. (2008). The role of uncertainty, ambiguity and framing in transition to adaptive management. About knowing too little, accepting not to know and knowing too differently.2 indexed citations
8.
Craps, Marc, René Bouwen, & Tharsi Taillieu. (2007). Learning to collaborate between business, government and social movements for the transition to sustainable material management. 1(4). 83–98.3 indexed citations
9.
Dewulf, Art, et al.. (2007). The differentiation of issues and stakes: framing and reframing in an interactive water area planning process. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1–16.
10.
Taillieu, Tharsi, et al.. (2005). Multi-party collaboration at BP.1 indexed citations
11.
Witte, Karel De, et al.. (2004). Samenwerking tussen diensten voor pleegzorg in Limburg: eerste tussentijds rapport.
Taillieu, Tharsi, et al.. (2000). Dynamiek van samenwerking tussen organisaties. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 147–164.1 indexed citations
17.
Taillieu, Tharsi, et al.. (1999). Trust within teams: Implications for performance and effectiveness.2 indexed citations
Taillieu, Tharsi, et al.. (1994). Business process reengineering or socio-technical system design in new clothes?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 91–100.2 indexed citations
20.
Taillieu, Tharsi, et al.. (1994). Recent conceptual developments in telework research. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.