Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Dovers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Dovers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Dovers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Dovers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Dovers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Dovers. The network helps show where Stephen Dovers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Dovers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Dovers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Dovers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Dovers. Stephen Dovers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
March, Alan, Graeme Riddell, Hedwig van Delden, et al.. (2020). Urban planning capabilities for bushfire: Treatment categories and scenario testing. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 35(3). 32.5 indexed citations
3.
Dovers, Stephen, et al.. (2018). Can major post-event inquiries and reviews contribute to lessons management?. Australian Journal of Emergency Management.11 indexed citations
4.
Dovers, Stephen, et al.. (2017). Reviewing high-risk and high-consequence decisions: finding a safer way. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 32(4). 26.2 indexed citations
5.
Pittock, Jamie, Karen Hussey, & Stephen Dovers. (2015). Climate, Energy and Water. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
6.
Dovers, Stephen, et al.. (2014). How chief officers view success in fire policy and management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 29(3). 16.3 indexed citations
7.
Dovers, Stephen, et al.. (2014). Risk management from a legal and governance perspective. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 4(1). 61–72.
Dovers, Stephen, et al.. (2012). Mainstreaming fire and emergency management across legal and policy sectors. Preliminary findings on measures of success. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 27(2). 14.1 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Timothy F., Bill Carter, Dana C. Thomsen, et al.. (2009). Enhancing science impact in the coastal zone through adaptive learning. Journal of Coastal Research. 56. 1–4.12 indexed citations
11.
Handmer, John & Stephen Dovers. (2008). Policy Development and Design for Fire and Emergency Management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 23(1). 21–29.5 indexed citations
12.
Östberg, Jacob, David Godden, Robin Connor, et al.. (2005). INDEX OF VOLUME 49. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 49(4). 463–467.1 indexed citations
13.
Dovers, Stephen. (2005). Clarifying the Imperative of Integration Research for Sustainable Environmental Management. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(2). 2.38 indexed citations
14.
Dovers, Stephen. (2005). Environment and sustainability policy.13 indexed citations
Dovers, Stephen, et al.. (1999). 'Ecological emergencies' and resource and environmental management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 14(3). 2–7.1 indexed citations
20.
Dovers, Stephen. (1998). Community Involvement in Environmental Management: Thoughts for Emergency Management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 13(2). 6.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.