Teri Pipe

32 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

Teri Pipe
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Research and Theory 28
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 38
  • Clinical Psychology 216
  • General Health Professions 232
  • Leadership and Management 8
Replace Maria Bailey with:
Maria Bailey Ireland
Rothlyn P. Zahourek United States
Shu‐Yuan Chao Taiwan
Besti Üstün Türkiye
W. Richard Cowling United States
Evmorfia Koukia Greece
Anne Boykin United States
Sister Rita McNulty United States
Pilar Bas‐Sarmiento Spain
Karen Moore Schaefer United States
Teri Pipe relative to Maria Bailey Ireland Maria Bailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Maria Bailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Teri Pipe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Teri Pipe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teri Pipe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teri Pipe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Teri Pipe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teri Pipe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teri Pipe. The network helps show where Teri Pipe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Teri Pipe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Teri Pipe Line = papers co-authored together Teri Pipe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009170
2 201069
3 201650
4 201332
5 202129
6 200929
7 201026
8 201125
9 200825
10 200818
11
Implementing evidence-based nursing practice.
200517
12 200816
13 200915
14 201615
15
A prospective descriptive study exploring hope, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in hospitalized patients.
200813
16 201010
17 202110
18 20079
19 20128
20 20097

About Teri Pipe

Teri Pipe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Clinical Psychology, Research and Theory and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 33 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (8 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (6 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (6 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (28 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (38 citations), Clinical Psychology (216 citations), General Health Professions (232 citations) and Leadership and Management (8 citations). Teri Pipe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and India. Frequent co-authors include Vicki L. Buchda, Jennifer J. Bortz, Amylou C. Dueck, Sharon Tucker, Susanna R. Stevens, Marcelline R. Harris, Kay E. Wellik, Ryan Smith, B. Blair Braden and Leslie C. Baxter. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Administration Quarterly, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Journal of Engineering Education and Journal of Community Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact