Leslie C. Baxter
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Richard J. CaselliMichael DancigerDebora B. FarberMeredithe AppleburyCathy BowesTiansen LiEric M. ReimanSterling C. Johnson
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers)MRI in cancer diagnosis (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Leslie C. Baxter
93 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.2k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 928
Countries citing papers authored by Leslie C. Baxter
This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie C. Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie C. Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie C. Baxter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie C. Baxter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie C. Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie C. Baxter. The network helps show where Leslie C. Baxter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie C. Baxter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie C. Baxter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie C. Baxter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie C. Baxter. Leslie C. Baxter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 112 | |
| 18 | 303 | |
| 19 | 102 | |
| 20 | 107 |
About Leslie C. Baxter
Leslie C. Baxter is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 96 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations) and Genetics (623 citations). Leslie C. Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Caselli, Michael Danciger, Debora B. Farber, Meredithe Applebury, Cathy Bowes, Tiansen Li, Eric M. Reiman, Sterling C. Johnson, Donald J. Connor and Amylou C. Dueck. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, New England Journal of Medicine and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.