Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Review and Current Status of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)
2015231 citationsPaul Cozens, Terence LoveJournal of Planning Literatureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Terence Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Terence Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terence Love more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Terence Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Terence Love. The network helps show where Terence Love may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Terence Love
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Terence Love.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Terence Love based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Terence Love. Terence Love is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cozens, Paul & Terence Love. (2015). A Review and Current Status of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature. 30(4). 393–412.231 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Cooper, Trudi, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Indigenous justice programs.: final report / Project D, Safe Aboriginal Youth Patrol Programs in New South Wales and Northbridge Policy and Juvenile Aid Group in Western Australia. 15(6). 5–10.2 indexed citations
Love, Terence. (2009). Design and Emotion: Time for a New Direction?. eSpace (Curtin University).1 indexed citations
7.
Love, Terence. (2009). Counter-intuitive design thinking: implications for design education, research and practice. eSpace (Curtin University).1 indexed citations
8.
Rose, Mary Beth, Terence Love, & Mike Parsons. (2007). Path-dependent Foundation of Global Design-driven Outdoor Trade in the Northwest of England. eSpace (Curtin University). 1(3). 57–68.195 indexed citations
Love, Terence. (2003). Implications for design-focused professional doctorates of Australian research into professional doctorates. eSpace (Curtin University). 16(1). 77–86.1 indexed citations
13.
Love, Terence. (2003). A fork in the road: systems and design. eSpace (Curtin University).2 indexed citations
14.
Love, Terence. (2003). Customers' Use of Products as Design Tools.1 indexed citations
Love, Terence. (2002). Developments in Management information systems and product design: Structural implications and failure reduction. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.1 indexed citations
17.
Love, Terence, et al.. (2002). Understanding Design and Design Management through constituent market orientation and constituent orientation. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.3 indexed citations
18.
Cooper, Trudi & Terence Love. (2001). Online portfolio assessment in information systems. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.4 indexed citations
19.
Love, Terence, et al.. (2001). Constituent market orientation and virtual organisations. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.