Citations per year, relative to Ted M. Sichelman Ted M. Sichelman (= 1×)
peers
Katrin Cremers
Countries citing papers authored by Ted M. Sichelman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ted M. Sichelman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted M. Sichelman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted M. Sichelman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ted M. Sichelman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted M. Sichelman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted M. Sichelman. The network helps show where Ted M. Sichelman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ted M. Sichelman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ted M. Sichelman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ted M. Sichelman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ted M. Sichelman. Ted M. Sichelman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sichelman, Ted M. & Henry E. Smith. (2024). A network model of legal relations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 382(2270). 20230153–20230153.3 indexed citations
2.
Barnett, Jonathan & Ted M. Sichelman. (2020). The Case for Noncompetes. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
3.
Levine, David S. & Ted M. Sichelman. (2019). Why Do Startups Use Trade Secrets. The Notre Dame law review. 94(2). 751.1 indexed citations
4.
Sichelman, Ted M.. (2016). Innovation Factors for Reasonable Royalties. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
5.
Sichelman, Ted M., et al.. (2016). Data-Generating Patents. Northwestern University law review. 111(2). 377–438.8 indexed citations
6.
Sichelman, Ted M.. (2014). The Vonage Trilogy: A Case Study in "Patent Bullying". The Notre Dame law review. 90(2). 543.5 indexed citations
Sichelman, Ted M., et al.. (2013). Enforcement as Substance in Tax Compliance. Washington and Lee law review. 70(3). 1679.4 indexed citations
10.
Kesan, Jay P., David A. Schwartz, & Ted M. Sichelman. (2012). Paving the Path to Predicting Legal Outcomes: A Response to Professor Chien's Predicting Patent Litigation. Texas law review. 90. 97–109.1 indexed citations
11.
Sichelman, Ted M. & Seán M. O’Connor. (2012). Patents as Promoters of Competition: The Guild Origins of Patent Law in the Venetian Republic. San Diego law review. 49(4). 1267.4 indexed citations
12.
Schwartz, David A., Jay P. Kesan, & Ted M. Sichelman. (2012). Paving the Path to Accurately Predicting Legal Outcomes: A Comment on Professor Chien’s Predicting Patent Litigation.3 indexed citations
13.
Sichelman, Ted M. & Stuart J.H. Graham. (2011). Why Do Entrepreneurs Patent. Chapters.1 indexed citations
14.
Sichelman, Ted M.. (2011). Taking Commercialisation Seriously. SSRN Electronic Journal.
15.
Lemley, Mark A., et al.. (2011). Life After Bilski. Stanford Law Review. 63(6). 1315.7 indexed citations
16.
Graham, Stuart J.H. & Ted M. Sichelman. (2010). Patenting by Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study. SSRN Electronic Journal.21 indexed citations
17.
Sichelman, Ted M. & Stuart J.H. Graham. (2010). Patenting by Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study. 17(1). 111–180.13 indexed citations
18.
Sichelman, Ted M.. (2010). Myths of (Un)Certainty at the Federal Circuit. Loyola of Los Angeles law review. 43(3). 1161.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.