Ted Eschenbach

53 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers

Ted Eschenbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Architecture 28
  • Finance 109
  • Management Science and Operations Research 76
  • Strategy and Management 91
  • Media Technology 52
Replace Mario G. Beruvides with:
Mario G. Beruvides United States
Kim LaScola Needy United States
K.J. Rogers United States
W. Edward Back United States
Donald S. Remer United States
Grant Mills United Kingdom
Massimo Regona Australia
Danijela Tadić Serbia
Taoyong Su China
Kenneth F. Reinschmidt United States
Ted Eschenbach relative to Mario G. Beruvides United States Mario G. Beruvides's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Mario G. Beruvides · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Eschenbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Eschenbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Eschenbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Eschenbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Eschenbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Eschenbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Eschenbach. The network helps show where Ted Eschenbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ted Eschenbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Eschenbach Line = papers co-authored together Ted Eschenbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992106
2
Engineering Economy: Applying Theory to Practice
199579
3 201527
4 198927
5
Essentials of engineering economic analysis
197625
6 200622
7 200820
8 200718
9 200017
10 200616
11 199015
12 199915
13 199614
14
Cases in engineering economy
198912
15 200911
16 19859
17 20089
18 20118
19 20115
20 20205

About Ted Eschenbach

Ted Eschenbach is a scholar working on Finance, Strategy and Management, Media Technology, Education and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (15 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (4 papers), Management and Performance Evaluation (4 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (3 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (28 citations), Finance (109 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (76 citations), Strategy and Management (91 citations) and Media Technology (52 citations). Ted Eschenbach has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph C. Hartman, Richard. D. Cohen, Heather Nachtmann, Kim LaScola Needy, William V. Harper, J. B. Whittaker, Gillian Nicholls, Alice E. Smith, William Schell and Paul J. Componation. Their work appears in journals such as The Engineering Economist, Engineering Management Journal, INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, Journal of Management in Engineering and Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact