Tânia Fernandes

818 total citations
32 papers, 560 citations indexed

About

Tânia Fernandes is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tânia Fernandes has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 560 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tânia Fernandes's work include Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers). Tânia Fernandes is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers). Tânia Fernandes collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Belgium and Netherlands. Tânia Fernandes's co-authors include Régine Kolinsky, Paulo Ventura, José Morais, Susana Araújo, Falk Huettig, Julie Nys, Jacqueline Leybaert, Alain Content, José Morais and Laurent Cohen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Tânia Fernandes

30 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tânia Fernandes Portugal 16 343 279 179 176 112 32 560
Sumarga H. Suanda United States 12 478 1.4× 211 0.8× 182 1.0× 112 0.6× 129 1.2× 18 688
M. Louise Kelly United Kingdom 9 602 1.8× 507 1.8× 158 0.9× 156 0.9× 93 0.8× 11 797
Zhenguang G. Cai Hong Kong 17 315 0.9× 519 1.9× 112 0.6× 256 1.5× 27 0.2× 56 736
Xenia Schmalz Italy 11 416 1.2× 202 0.7× 132 0.7× 61 0.3× 131 1.2× 27 518
Frauke Hellwig Netherlands 9 377 1.1× 416 1.5× 42 0.2× 140 0.8× 63 0.6× 11 575
Fabienne Chetail Belgium 17 449 1.3× 333 1.2× 145 0.8× 147 0.8× 78 0.7× 38 551
Sami Boudelaa United Kingdom 14 615 1.8× 445 1.6× 149 0.8× 192 1.1× 64 0.6× 28 817
Leslie C. Twilley Canada 9 480 1.4× 438 1.6× 73 0.4× 208 1.2× 44 0.4× 13 700
Sofie Schoonbaert Belgium 6 648 1.9× 639 2.3× 63 0.4× 212 1.2× 33 0.3× 6 834
Maria Ktori Italy 12 243 0.7× 194 0.7× 66 0.4× 98 0.6× 44 0.4× 21 407

Countries citing papers authored by Tânia Fernandes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tânia Fernandes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tânia Fernandes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tânia Fernandes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tânia Fernandes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tânia Fernandes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tânia Fernandes. The network helps show where Tânia Fernandes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tânia Fernandes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tânia Fernandes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tânia Fernandes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tânia Fernandes. Tânia Fernandes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2025). Mirror invariance dies hard during letter processing by dyslexic college students. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 37395–37395.
2.
Bergström, Kirstin, Jascha Rüsseler, Tânia Fernandes, et al.. (2024). The cognitive profile of adults with low literacy skills in alphabetic orthographies: A systematic review and comparison with developmental dyslexia. Educational Research Review. 46. 100659–100659.
3.
Fernandes, Tânia & Susana Araújo. (2021). From Hand to Eye With the Devil In-Between: Which Cognitive Mechanisms Underpin the Benefit From Handwriting Training When Learning Visual Graphs?. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 736507–736507. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ventura, Paulo, et al.. (2020). Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(5). 2739–2750. 15 indexed citations
6.
Huettig, Falk, et al.. (2019). Mirror-image discrimination in Tamil. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
7.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2019). Is holistic processing of written words modulated by phonology?. Acta Psychologica. 201. 102944–102944. 6 indexed citations
8.
Ventura, Paulo, et al.. (2018). The development of holistic face processing: An evaluation with the complete design of the composite task. Acta Psychologica. 191. 32–41. 6 indexed citations
9.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2017). Mirrors are hard to break: A critical review and behavioral evidence on mirror-image processing in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 159. 66–82. 22 indexed citations
10.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2016). Into the Looking Glass: Literacy Acquisition and Mirror Invariance in Preschool and First-Grade Children. Child Development. 87(6). 2008–2025. 30 indexed citations
11.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2014). A cultural side effect: learning to read interferes with identity processing of familiar objects. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1224–1224. 18 indexed citations
12.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2013). The deficit of letter processing in developmental dyslexia: combining evidence from dyslexics, typical readers and illiterate adults. Developmental Science. 17(1). 125–141. 34 indexed citations
13.
Ventura, Paulo, Tânia Fernandes, Laurent Cohen, et al.. (2013). Literacy acquisition reduces the influence of automatic holistic processing of faces and houses. Neuroscience Letters. 554. 105–109. 37 indexed citations
14.
Fernandes, Tânia & Régine Kolinsky. (2012). From hand to eye: The role of literacy, familiarity, graspability, and vision-for-action on enantiomorphy. Acta Psychologica. 142(1). 51–61. 22 indexed citations
15.
Kolinsky, Régine, et al.. (2011). Enantiomorphy through the looking glass: Literacy effects on mirror-image discrimination.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 140(2). 210–238. 68 indexed citations
16.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2010). The impact of attention load on the use of statistical information and coarticulation as speech segmentation cues. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 72(6). 1522–1532. 37 indexed citations
17.
Fernandes, Tânia, Régine Kolinsky, & Paulo Ventura. (2009). The metamorphosis of the statistical segmentation output: Lexicalization during artificial language learning. Cognition. 112(3). 349–366. 29 indexed citations
18.
Ventura, Paulo, Chotiga Pattamadilok, Tânia Fernandes, et al.. (2008). Schooling in western culture promotes context-free processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 100(2). 79–88. 25 indexed citations
19.
Fernandes, Tânia, Paulo Ventura, & Régine Kolinsky. (2007). Statistical information and coarticulation as cues to word boundaries: A matter of signal quality. Perception & Psychophysics. 69(6). 856–864. 30 indexed citations
20.
Fernandes, Tânia, et al.. (2003). Switching and clustering on verbal fluency: a portuguese developmental study. Open Repository of the University of Porto (University of Porto). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026