Tânia Fernandes
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Régine KolinskyPaulo VenturaJosé MoraisSusana AraújoFalk HuettigJulie NysAlain ContentJacqueline Leybaert
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChild DevelopmentScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- PortugalBelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Tânia Fernandes
30 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 343
- Cognitive Neuroscience 279
- Statistics and Probability 179
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 176
- Education 112
Countries citing papers authored by Tânia Fernandes
This map shows the geographic impact of Tânia Fernandes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tânia Fernandes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tânia Fernandes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tânia Fernandes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tânia Fernandes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tânia Fernandes. The network helps show where Tânia Fernandes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tânia Fernandes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tânia Fernandes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tânia Fernandes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tânia Fernandes. Tânia Fernandes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 68 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Tânia Fernandes
Tânia Fernandes is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (343 citations), Statistics and Probability (179 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (279 citations). Tânia Fernandes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Régine Kolinsky, Paulo Ventura, José Morais, Susana Araújo, Falk Huettig, Julie Nys, Alain Content, Jacqueline Leybaert, José Morais and Laurent Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.