Tami Dinh

459 total citations
28 papers, 252 citations indexed

About

Tami Dinh is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Tami Dinh has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 252 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Accounting, 17 papers in Strategy and Management and 7 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Tami Dinh's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (13 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers). Tami Dinh is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (13 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers). Tami Dinh collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Australia. Tami Dinh's co-authors include Wolfgang Schultze, Helen Kang, Gaia Melloni, Thomas List, Andreas Rathgeber, Brigitte Eierle, Andrew B. Jackson, Susan G. O'Ĺeary, Baljit K. Sidhu and Mandy M. Cheng and has published in prestigious journals such as Accounting Organizations and Society, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal and Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.

In The Last Decade

Tami Dinh

25 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tami Dinh Switzerland	9	154	132	44	43	31	28	252
Yue Lu New Zealand	10	185 1.2×	106 0.8×	63 1.4×	70 1.6×	27 0.9×	21	254
Huiqi Gan United States	9	205 1.3×	100 0.8×	43 1.0×	36 0.8×	17 0.5×	16	256
Ahmet C. Kurt United States	7	226 1.5×	112 0.8×	61 1.4×	34 0.8×	17 0.5×	15	287
Xinghua Gao United States	8	214 1.4×	160 1.2×	52 1.2×	40 0.9×	46 1.5×	20	291
Awad Elsayed Awad Ibrahim United Kingdom	10	279 1.8×	168 1.3×	56 1.3×	51 1.2×	23 0.7×	18	367
Diandian Ma New Zealand	10	157 1.0×	143 1.1×	63 1.4×	98 2.3×	58 1.9×	25	289
Sarowar Hossain Australia	10	252 1.6×	131 1.0×	39 0.9×	31 0.7×	33 1.1×	18	321
Belén Blanco Australia	9	235 1.5×	188 1.4×	58 1.3×	24 0.6×	51 1.6×	14	306
Peter Nderitu Githaiga Kenya	9	182 1.2×	135 1.0×	33 0.8×	82 1.9×	24 0.8×	32	282
Chih‐Hsien Liao Taiwan	9	251 1.6×	147 1.1×	37 0.8×	24 0.6×	30 1.0×	23	310

Countries citing papers authored by Tami Dinh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tami Dinh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tami Dinh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tami Dinh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tami Dinh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tami Dinh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tami Dinh. The network helps show where Tami Dinh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tami Dinh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tami Dinh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tami Dinh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tami Dinh. Tami Dinh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dinh, Tami & Susan G. O'Ĺeary. (2024). The unaccounted effects of digital transformation: participatory accountability in a humanitarian organisation. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal. 38(3). 824–852. 3 indexed citations

Allee, Kristian D., et al.. (2023). Cross-Border Investments in Private Firms: The Benefits of Comparability for Foreign Investors. SSRN Electronic Journal.

O'Ĺeary, Susan G., et al.. (2023). Affirmative otherness in a humanitarian NGO: Implications for accountability as responsiveness. Accounting Organizations and Society. 111. 101495–101495. 8 indexed citations

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2022). Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Performance in Europe: A Scoping Review. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2022). Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Europe: A Scoping Review. Accounting in Europe. 20(1). 1–29. 54 indexed citations

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2020). The Information Content of Hedge Accounting—Evidence from the European Banking Industry. Journal of International Accounting Research. 19(2). 91–115. 3 indexed citations

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2020). R&D Disclosures and Capitalization under IAS 38—Evidence on the Interplay between National Institutional Regulations and IFRS Adoption. Journal of International Accounting Research. 19(1). 29–55. 8 indexed citations

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2020). R&D Disclosures and Capitalization Under IAS 38 – Evidence on the Interplay Between National Institutional Regulations and IFRS Adoption. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2019). Non-GAAP earnings disclosures around regulation G – The case of “implicit non-GAAP reporting”. Advances in Accounting. 46. 100432–100432. 5 indexed citations

10.

Cheng, Mandy M., et al.. (2019). The Effect of Bonus Deferral on Managers' Investment Decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 31(2). 31–49. 6 indexed citations

11.

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2019). Accounting for Intangibles: Can Capitalization of R&D Improve Investment Efficiency?. Abacus. 55(1). 92–127. 9 indexed citations

12.

Müller‐Stewens, Günter, et al.. (2018). The Professionalization of Humanitarian Organizations. 6 indexed citations

13.

Schultze, Wolfgang, et al.. (2017). Economic consequences of implementing and communicating value based management systems. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 45(5-6). 511–543. 12 indexed citations

14.

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2016). Hedge Accounting During Times of Crises: Evidence from the European Banking Industry. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 1 indexed citations

15.

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2015). Research and Development, Uncertainty, and Analysts’ Forecasts: The Case of IAS 38. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting. 26(3). 257–293. 21 indexed citations

16.

Dinh, Tami, Helen Kang, & Wolfgang Schultze. (2015). Capitalizing Research & Development: Signaling or Earnings Management?. European Accounting Review. 25(2). 373–401. 60 indexed citations

17.

Dinh, Tami, et al.. (2015). The impact of sentiment on price discovery. Accounting and Finance. 56(3). 669–694. 12 indexed citations

18.

Dinh, Tami, Helen Kang, & Wolfgang Schultze. (2013). Discretionary Capitalization of R&D -- The Trade-Off Between Earnings Management and Signaling. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

19.

Dinh, Tami, Helen Kang, Richard D. Morris, & Wolfgang Schultze. (2013). IFRS adoption in Australia: The case of reporting for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 1 indexed citations

20.

Schultze, Wolfgang & Tami Dinh. (2007). Kapitalwertneutrale Wiederanlage in der Unternehmensbewertung: Die Ermittlung der Mindestrenditen von Kapitalgesellschaften bei Thesaurierung. Journal of Business Economics. 77(11). 1179–1216. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact