Emily Cramer

64 papers receiving 919 citations

Peers

Emily Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Research and Theory 126
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 33
  • Leadership and Management 23
  • Emergency Medical Services 97
  • General Health Professions 339
Replace Jo‐Ann Giandinoto with:
Jo‐Ann Giandinoto Australia
Kristiina Hyrkäs United States
Loreto Lancia Italy
Cristina Petrucci Italy
Ellen Rukholm Canada
Daniela Tartaglini Italy
Marzieh Momennasab Iran
Giovanna Artioli Italy
Lesley Baillie United Kingdom
Vicki Cope Australia
Emily Cramer relative to Jo‐Ann Giandinoto Australia Jo‐Ann Giandinoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jo‐Ann Giandinoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Cramer. The network helps show where Emily Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Emily Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016176
2 201981
3 201353
4 201848
5 202047
6 201646
7 201439
8 201537
9 201336
10 201632
11 201726
12 201824
13 201720
14 202218
15 201917
16 202017
17 202016
18 201216
19 201415
20 201415

About Emily Cramer

Emily Cramer is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Emergency Medical Services and General Health Professions, having authored 69 papers that have together received 992 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (126 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations), Leadership and Management (23 citations), Emergency Medical Services (97 citations) and General Health Professions (339 citations). Emily Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hayeon Song, Nora E. Warshawsky, Vincent S. Staggs, Diane K. Boyle, Susan McRoy, Catima Potter, Kelly E. Tenzek, Ronald I. Shorr, Jessica G. Smith and Eileen T. Lake. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Nursing & Health, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, International Journal of Nursing Studies, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology and American Journal of Men s Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026