Jake Harwood

140 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Hit Papers

The Contact Caveat20122026201620212012100200300400

Peers

Jake Harwood
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Sociology and Political Science 3.5k
  • Social Psychology 2.1k
  • Gender Studies 1.1k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 962
  • Communication 895
Replace Moin Syed with:
Moin Syed United States
Sheri R. Levy United States
Richard Y. Bourhis Canada
Richard J. Crisp United Kingdom
Laurel Richardson United States
Stephen C. Wright United States
Leslie A. Baxter United States
Charles Stangor United States
Victoria M. Esses Canada
Mary E. Kite United States
Jake Harwood relative to Moin Syed United States Moin Syed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Moin Syed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jake Harwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Harwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Harwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Harwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Harwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Harwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Harwood. The network helps show where Jake Harwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jake Harwood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jake Harwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jake Harwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jake Harwood. Jake Harwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 2
3 1
4 7
5 4
6
Grandparent–Grandchild Communication and Attitudes Toward Older Adults: Relational Solidarity and Shared Family Identity in China
4
7 4
8 3
9 7
10
Parasocial Contact's Effects on Relations Between Minority Groups in a Multiracial Context
5
11
The Negative and Positive Influences of Threat and Nonthreat Media Messages About Immigrants
9
12 105
13 38
14 195
15 35
16
Intergroup communication : multiple perspectives
226
17 200
18 29
19 89
20
The casino industry.
1

About Jake Harwood

Jake Harwood is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Communication and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 144 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (53 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (31 papers) and Media Influence and Health (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (962 citations), Communication (895 citations) and Gender Studies (1.1k citations). Jake Harwood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Howard Giles, Стефаниа Паолини, Mark Rubin, Miles Hewstone, Analisa Arroyo, Yan Bing Zhang, Nick Joyce, Michelle Ortiz, Alberto Voci and Mary Lee Hummert. Their work appears in journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026