T. M. Luhrmann
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Health top 1%
- Co-authors
- Veena DasPadmavati RamachandranJulia CassanitiHema TharoorHoward C. NusbaumRonald A. ThistedAkwasi OseiMichael Lifshitz
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthPhilosophyAnthropology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
T. M. Luhrmann
81 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Sociology and Political Science 990
- Social Psychology 658
- Philosophy 618
- Clinical Psychology 612
- Health 521
Countries citing papers authored by T. M. Luhrmann
This map shows the geographic impact of T. M. Luhrmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. M. Luhrmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. M. Luhrmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. M. Luhrmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. M. Luhrmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. M. Luhrmann. The network helps show where T. M. Luhrmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. M. Luhrmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. M. Luhrmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. M. Luhrmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. M. Luhrmann. T. M. Luhrmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | "Think" and "believe" across cultures: A shared folk distinction between two cognitive attitudes in the US, Ghana, Thailand, China, and Vanuatu. | 2 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 86 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 142 | |
| 15 | 118 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 88 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About T. M. Luhrmann
T. M. Luhrmann is a scholar working on Philosophy, Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (521 citations), Philosophy (618 citations) and Anthropology (423 citations). T. M. Luhrmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Veena Das, Padmavati Ramachandran, Julia Cassaniti, Hema Tharoor, Howard C. Nusbaum, Ronald A. Thisted, Akwasi Osei, Michael Lifshitz, Michiel van Elk and Nev Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.