Jon Bialecki

992 citations
39 papers · 520 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Bialecki

33 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Jon Bialecki
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Anthropology 284
  • Geography, Planning and Development 113
  • Religious studies 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 361
  • Philosophy 55
Replace James S. Bielo with:
James S. Bielo United States
Vincent Goossaert France
Lawrence A. Babb United States
Amira Mittermaier Canada
Charles Forsdick United Kingdom
Bernhard W. Scholz United States
Diane P. Mines United States
Mayanthi Fernando United States
P.J. Margry Netherlands
Andreas Bandak Denmark
Jon Bialecki relative to James S. Bielo United States James S. Bielo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
James S. Bielo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Bialecki

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Bialecki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Bialecki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Bialecki more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Bialecki

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Bialecki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Bialecki. The network helps show where Jon Bialecki may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jon Bialecki, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Bialecki Line = papers co-authored together Jon Bialecki links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200882
2 200947
3 201447
4 201243
5 201742
6 201140
7 200834
8 201529
9 201125
10 201424
11 201417
12 201014
13
A Diagram for Fire: Miracles and Variation in an American Charismatic Movement
201710
14 20188
15 20157
16 20177
17 20186
18 20165
19 20165
20 20204

About Jon Bialecki

Jon Bialecki is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Geography, Planning and Development, Religious studies and History, having authored 39 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (17 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (16 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (8 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (6 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (4 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (284 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (113 citations), Religious studies (69 citations), Sociology and Political Science (361 citations) and Philosophy (55 citations). Jon Bialecki has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joel Robbins, Naomi Haynes, Girish Daswani, Adam Reed, Andrew Sanchez, Razvan Amironesei, James S. Bielo, T. M. Luhrmann, Timothy Larsen and Maya Mayblin. Their work appears in journals such as Social Anthropology, American Ethnologist, Pneuma, Current Anthropology and Ethnos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact