T. E. Archer

665 citations
63 papers · 490 indexed · h-index 14

T. E. Archer

62 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

T. E. Archer
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Food Science 167
  • Pollution 103
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 81
  • Insect Science 63
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 14
Replace R. C. Blinn with:
R. C. Blinn United States
L.R. Provost Canada
Harlan L. Pease United States
R. W. Reiser United States
Celso E. Mendoza Canada
Kenley K. Ngim United States
Sadao UCHIYAMA Japan
S. Nitz Germany
R.J. Clarke United Kingdom
H. A. McLeod Canada
T. E. Archer relative to R. C. Blinn United States R. C. Blinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
R. C. Blinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. E. Archer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. E. Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. E. Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. E. Archer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. E. Archer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. E. Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. E. Archer. The network helps show where T. E. Archer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. E. Archer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. E. Archer Line = papers co-authored together T. E. Archer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
The development of seed treatment products based on the new fungicide ipconazole.
20091
2 199113
3 19895
4 19800
5 19808
6 197614
7 19752
8 19734
9 19728
10
Toxaphene and DDT residues in ladino clover seed screenings.
19701
11 19702
12 19692
13 19684
14 19679
15 196716
16 196625
17 196615
18 19627
19 19565
20 195611

About T. E. Archer

T. E. Archer is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Process Chemistry and Technology, Biochemistry and Pollution, having authored 63 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (23 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (6 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (6 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (6 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (167 citations), Pollution (103 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (81 citations), Insect Science (63 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (14 citations). T. E. Archer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Donald G. Crosby, GUNTER ZWEIG, R.C. Laben, S. A. Peoples, R. S. Bringhurst, Rubén A. Toscano, V. Michael Lane, Marie S. Bulgin, L. W. Getzin and Arthur L. Craigmill. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Journal of Dairy Science, Journal of Food Science and American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026