Susan Stone
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Immunology and Allergy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jane SomervillePatrizia PresbiteroFilippo RabajoliJohn C. ChambersDonald N. RossG RizzoliLuciano DalientoLiana Menti
- Topics
- Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBulgariaItaly
In The Last Decade
Susan Stone
15 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 835
- Epidemiology 744
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 653
- Surgery 489
- Immunology and Allergy 65
Countries citing papers authored by Susan Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Stone. The network helps show where Susan Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Stone. Susan Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | Best Practices in Midwifery: Using the Evidence to Implement Change | 2 |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 337 | |
| 8 | 73 | |
| 9 | 195 | |
| 10 | 108 | |
| 11 | 264 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 113 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | BLOOD CLOTTING FACTORS IN PREGNANCY: FACTOR 8 CONCENTRATIONS IN NORMAL AND AHF-DEFICIENT WOMEN. | 31 |
About Susan Stone
Susan Stone is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Immunology and Allergy and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (835 citations), Epidemiology (744 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (653 citations). Susan Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bulgaria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jane Somerville, Patrizia Presbitero, Filippo Rabajoli, John C. Chambers, Donald N. Ross, G Rizzoli, Luciano Daliento, Liana Menti, E Aruta and David Spiegelhalter. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Environmental Health Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.