Deborah S. Walker

434 total citations
29 papers, 295 citations indexed

About

Deborah S. Walker is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah S. Walker has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 295 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 12 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Deborah S. Walker's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers). Deborah S. Walker is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers). Deborah S. Walker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Deborah S. Walker's co-authors include Lisa Summers, Cynthia S. Darling‐Fisher, Stephanie Myers Schim, Carmen Giurgescu, Rhonda Dailey, Dawn P. Misra, Ramona Benkert, Cynthia A. Danford, Sharon Schindler Rising and Cindy M. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Western Journal of Nursing Research and Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health.

In The Last Decade

Deborah S. Walker

27 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah S. Walker United States 11 125 111 103 80 47 29 295
Clare Ryan Australia 6 180 1.4× 168 1.5× 80 0.8× 106 1.3× 35 0.7× 7 315
Rose Maina Kenya 7 109 0.9× 121 1.1× 114 1.1× 37 0.5× 123 2.6× 11 337
Denise C. Smith United States 12 149 1.2× 111 1.0× 113 1.1× 93 1.2× 43 0.9× 22 346
Clémence Schantz France 10 177 1.4× 191 1.7× 83 0.8× 131 1.6× 20 0.4× 36 422
Vida Nyagre Yakong Ghana 9 48 0.4× 129 1.2× 87 0.8× 52 0.7× 44 0.9× 40 328
Helen Bryers United Kingdom 8 216 1.7× 135 1.2× 86 0.8× 74 0.9× 73 1.6× 13 349
Bente Dahl Norway 10 107 0.9× 90 0.8× 58 0.6× 93 1.2× 52 1.1× 40 301
C Flint United States 6 141 1.1× 74 0.7× 66 0.6× 75 0.9× 27 0.6× 29 250
Ngozi F. Anachebe United States 7 76 0.6× 85 0.8× 84 0.8× 194 2.4× 28 0.6× 9 324
Talita Oseguera United States 2 178 1.4× 79 0.7× 73 0.7× 118 1.5× 137 2.9× 5 313

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah S. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah S. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah S. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah S. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah S. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah S. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah S. Walker. The network helps show where Deborah S. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah S. Walker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah S. Walker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah S. Walker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah S. Walker. Deborah S. Walker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Saadat, Nadia, Deborah S. Walker, Todd A. Lydic, et al.. (2024). Changes in Lipid Profiles with the Progression of Pregnancy in Black Women. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 13(10). 2795–2795.
2.
Giurgescu, Carmen, Sarah Vaughan, Rhonda Dailey, et al.. (2021). Loneliness and Depressive Symptoms among Pregnant Black Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 44(1). 23–30. 11 indexed citations
3.
Saadat, Nadia, Todd A. Lydic, Dawn P. Misra, et al.. (2020). Lipidome Profiles Are Related to Depressive Symptoms and Preterm Birth Among African American Women. Biological Research For Nursing. 22(3). 354–361. 8 indexed citations
4.
Giurgescu, Carmen, Liying Zhang, Rhonda Dailey, et al.. (2020). Prenatal cigarette smoking as a mediator between racism and depressive symptoms: The Biosocial Impact on Black Births Study. Public Health Nursing. 37(5). 740–749. 8 indexed citations
5.
Dove‐Medows, Emily, Rhonda Dailey, Timiya S. Nolan, et al.. (2019). Pregnant African American Women's Perceptions of Neighborhood, Racial Discrimination, and Psychological Distress as Influences on Birth Outcomes. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 45(1). 49–56. 19 indexed citations
7.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2016). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. The Nurse Practitioner. 41(8). 28–34. 2 indexed citations
9.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2009). Contemporary Childbirth Education Models. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 54(6). 469–476. 38 indexed citations
10.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2008). Midwifery Data Collection: Options and Opportunities. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 53(5). 421–429. 10 indexed citations
11.
Walker, Deborah S.. (2007). Midwifery Models: Students’Conceptualization of A Midwifery Philosophy in Clay. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 52(1). 63–66. 1 indexed citations
12.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2005). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders prevention: An exploratory study of women's use of, attitudes toward, and knowledge about alcohol. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 17(5). 187–193. 29 indexed citations
13.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2004). Do birth certificate data accurately reflect the number of CNM-attended births? An exploratory study. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 49(5). 443–448. 10 indexed citations
14.
Donaldson, Stephen, et al.. (2004). The Preliminary Evaluation of a New Approach to Arrest Referral in Birmingham (UK). The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles. 77(4). 287–301. 2 indexed citations
15.
Walker, Deborah S., Andrew Finegan, & Tayyab Maqsood. (2003). Using a soft systems methodology approach to knowledge elicitation - an Australian case study. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 5 indexed citations
16.
Walker, Deborah S. & Joanne M. Pohl. (2003). Web‐Based Data Collection in Midwifery Clinical Education. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 48(6). 437–443. 2 indexed citations
17.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2002). REDUCED FREQUENCY PRENATAL VISITS IN MIDWIFERY PRACTICE: ATTITUDES AND USE. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 47(4). 269–277. 9 indexed citations
18.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2001). EVIDENCE‐BASED PRENATAL CARE VISITS: WHEN LESS IS MORE. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 46(3). 146–151. 24 indexed citations
19.
Guthrie, Barbara, et al.. (2001). Using Cognitive Theory to Improve Nurse Practitioners' Anticipatory Guidance With Contraceptive Pill Users. Journal of Community Health Nursing. 18(4). 223–234. 5 indexed citations
20.
Walker, Deborah S., et al.. (2001). Labor and Delivery Nurses' Attitudes Toward Intermittent Fetal Monitoring. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 46(6). 374–380. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026