Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Task Force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life
20011.0k citationsCarole A. Warnes, Richard R. Liberthson et al.Journal of the American College of Cardiologyprofile →
Mechanoelectrical Interaction in Tetralogy of Fallot
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Somerville
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Somerville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Somerville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Somerville more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Somerville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Somerville. The network helps show where Jane Somerville may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Somerville
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Somerville.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Somerville based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Somerville. Jane Somerville is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Little, Paul, Jane Somerville, Ian Williamson, et al.. (2001). Psychosocial, lifestyle, and health status variables in predicting high attendance among adults.. PubMed. 51(473). 987–94.52 indexed citations
Warnes, Carole A., Richard R. Liberthson, Gordon K. Danielson, et al.. (2001). Task Force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 37(5). 1170–1175.1037 indexed citations breakdown →
Webb, Gary D., Jane Somerville, Joseph K. Perloff, et al.. (1998). Canadian Consensus Conference on Adult Congenital Heart Disease 1996.. PubMed. 14(3). 395–452.95 indexed citations
Somerville, Jane. (1984). A Colour Atlas of Cardiac Surgery: Congenital Heart Disease. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 77(11). 991–991.3 indexed citations
14.
Somerville, Jane. (1979). Changing form and function in one ventricle hearts.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 4(2). 206–12.10 indexed citations
15.
Somerville, Jane, et al.. (1979). Ebstein's anomaly: late results of surgical correction.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 9(1). 39–52.19 indexed citations
16.
Somerville, Jane & L Becü. (1976). Diagnostic marketing - Starbucks, un succès durable ?. PubMed. 38(3). 316–316.5 indexed citations
17.
Somerville, Jane, et al.. (1975). Proceedings: Tricuspid atresia - new hope with radical palliative surgery.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 37(7). 782–782.6 indexed citations
18.
Somerville, Jane. (1969). Congenital Mitral Valve Disease. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London. 3(2). 133–141.8 indexed citations
Baker, Charles & Jane Somerville. (1959). Clinical features and surgical treatment of fifty patients with severe aortic stenosis.. PubMed. 108. 101–25.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.