Susan Napier

1.4k citations
39 papers · 432 indexed · h-index 10

Susan Napier

32 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Susan Napier
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cultural Studies 219
  • Sociology and Political Science 135
  • Gender Studies 84
  • Literature and Literary Theory 70
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 42
Replace Léo with:
Léo Germany
Ian Condry United States
Michele Hilmes United States
Charles Musser United States
Ronald J. Zboray United States
Liam Kennedy Canada
A. Peter Hayman United Kingdom
Carolina Acosta‐Alzuru United States
James R. Brandon United States
Jim Cullen Canada
Susan Napier relative to Léo Germany Léo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Léo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Susan Napier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Napier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Napier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Napier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Napier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Napier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Napier. The network helps show where Susan Napier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Napier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Napier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Napier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Napier. Susan Napier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 7
3 1
4
Death Note: The Killer in Me Is the Killer in You
1
5
Animation beyond the Boundaries
1
6 0
7
The Problem of Existence in Japanese Animation1
2
8
Anime from Akira to Howl's moving castle : experiencing contemporary Japanese animation
87
9 4
10 54
11
When the Machines Stop: Fantasy, Reality, and Terminal Identity in Neon Genesis Evangelion and Serial Experiments Lain
17
12 2
13 0
14 78
15 4
16 3
17 0
18 24
19
The logic of inversion : twentieth century Japanese utopias
0
20
Woman in the Crested Kimono : The Life of Shibue Io and Her Family Drawn from Mori Ogai's Shibue Chusai
1

About Susan Napier

Susan Napier is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 39 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (24 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (5 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (219 citations), Gender Studies (84 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (42 citations). Susan Napier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Naoko Kono, Rita M. Cantor, Betty P. Tsao, Jinying Yuan, Jennifer M. Grossman, Bevra H. Hahn, Van C. Gessel, Rita M. Cantor, Atila van Nas and Aldons J. Lusis. Their work appears in journals such as Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, American Ethnologist and The Journal of Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026