Stuart Weibel
About
In The Last Decade
Stuart Weibel
39 papers receiving 727 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Information Systems 443
- Artificial Intelligence 351
- Computer Networks and Communications 171
- Computer Science Applications 167
- Information Systems and Management 100
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Weibel
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Weibel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Weibel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Weibel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Weibel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Weibel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Weibel. The network helps show where Stuart Weibel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Weibel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Weibel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Weibel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Weibel. Stuart Weibel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Dublin Core Metadata Registry: Requirements, Implementation, and Experience | 5 |
| 2 | Trends in the Evolution of the Public Web, 1998-2002; The Fedora Project: An Open-source Digital Object Repository Management System; State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, April 2003; Preservation Metadata; How Many People Search the ERIC Database Each Day?. | 1 |
| 3 | QoS Policy Control by Application on the Next Generation Internet Technology | 2 |
| 4 | The National Digital Information Infrastructure Preservation Program; Metadata Principles and Practicalities; Challenges for Service Providers when Importing Metadata in Digital Libraries; Integrated and Aggregated Reference Services. | 1 |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 221 | |
| 8 | Introduction to a special issue on metadata: selected papers from the Dublin Core 2001 Conference | 0 |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 138 | |
| 11 | The National Engineering Education Delivery System: A Digital Library for Engineering Education [and] Reference Linking in a Hybrid Library Environment (Part 1: Frameworks for Linking & Part 2:SFX, a Generic Linking Solution) [and] The State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative [and] Distributed Information and Computation in Scientific and Engineering Environments. | 4 |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | DC-5: The Helsinki Metadata Workshop; A Report on the Workshop andSubsequent Developments | 18 |
| 14 | The 4th Dublin Core Metadata Workshop Report: DC-4, March 3-5, 1997,National Library of Australia, Canberra | 14 |
| 15 | Image Description on the Internet: A Summary of the CNI/OCLC Image Metadata Workshop September 24 - 25, 1996, Dublin, Ohio. | 15 |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | The 4th Dublin Core Metadata Workshop Report | 19 |
| 18 | The Warwick Metadata Workshop: A Framework for the Deployment ofResource Description | 28 |
| 19 | The World Wide Web and Emerging Internet Resource Discovery Standards for Scholarly Literature | 9 |
| 20 | 12 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.