Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth D. Liddy
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth D. Liddy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth D. Liddy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth D. Liddy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth D. Liddy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth D. Liddy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth D. Liddy. The network helps show where Elizabeth D. Liddy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth D. Liddy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth D. Liddy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth D. Liddy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth D. Liddy. Elizabeth D. Liddy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Turtle, Howard R., et al.. (2016). EmoTweet-28: A fine-grained emotion corpus for sentiment analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1149–1156.21 indexed citations
Stanton, Jeffrey M., Youngseek Kim, Megan Oakleaf, et al.. (2011). Education for eScience Professionals: Job Analysis, Curriculum Guidance, and Program Considerations. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 52(2). 79–94.22 indexed citations
4.
Rubin, Victoria L. & Elizabeth D. Liddy. (2006). Assessing credibility of weblogs. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 187–190.37 indexed citations
Liddy, Elizabeth D., et al.. (2005). Improved Document Representation for Classification Tasks for the Intelligence Community. Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University). 76–82.3 indexed citations
7.
Liddy, Elizabeth D., Noriko Kando, & Victoria L. Rubin. (2004). Certainty Categorization Model. Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University).4 indexed citations
8.
Rubin, Victoria L., Jeffrey M. Stanton, & Elizabeth D. Liddy. (2004). Discerning Emotions in Texts. Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University).21 indexed citations
9.
Diekema, Anne R., Özgür Yılmazel, & Elizabeth D. Liddy. (2004). Evaluation of Restricted Domain Question-Answering Systems. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2–7.17 indexed citations
Diekema, Anne R., Farhad Oroumchian, Páraic Sheridan, & Elizabeth D. Liddy. (1998). TREC-7 Evaluation of Conceptual Interlingua Document Retrieval (CINDOR) in English and French. Text REtrieval Conference. 116–127.9 indexed citations
12.
Paik, Woojin, et al.. (1996). Categorizing and standardizing proper nouns for efficient information retrieval. MIT Press eBooks. 61–73.27 indexed citations
13.
Liddy, Elizabeth D. & Sung-Hyon Myaeng. (1994). DR-LINK: A System Update for TREC-2. Text REtrieval Conference. 85–100.10 indexed citations
14.
Liddy, Elizabeth D., et al.. (1994). Document retrieval using linguistic knowledge. 106–114.5 indexed citations
15.
Liddy, Elizabeth D. & Sung Hyon Myaeng. (1993). DR-LINK's linguistic conceptual approach to document detection. Text REtrieval Conference. 113–129.26 indexed citations
16.
Liddy, Elizabeth D., et al.. (1993). Document Filtering using Semantic Information from a Machine Readable Dictionary. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.