Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being?
This map shows the geographic impact of Stoney Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stoney Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stoney Brooks more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stoney Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stoney Brooks. The network helps show where Stoney Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stoney Brooks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stoney Brooks.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stoney Brooks based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stoney Brooks. Stoney Brooks is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Erskine, Michael A. & Stoney Brooks. (2019). Attitude and Behavioral Intentions Regarding Autonomous Automobiles: Effects of Emotional Response and Locus of Control.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Islam, A.K.M. Najmul, Eoin Whelan, & Stoney Brooks. (2018). SOCIAL MEDIA OVERLOAD AND FATIGUE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF MULTITASKING COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.10 indexed citations
11.
Whelan, Eoin, A.K.M. Najmul Islam, & Stoney Brooks. (2017). COGNITIVE CONTROL AND SOCIAL MEDIA OVERLOAD. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.12 indexed citations
Brooks, Stoney, Christoph Schneider, & Xuequn Wang. (2016). Technology Addictions and Technostress: An Examination of Hong Kong and the U.S.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.5 indexed citations
Brooks, Stoney. (2015). Being Social isn't Just About Fun: An Examination of Personal Social Media Usage. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
16.
Brooks, Stoney & Phil Longstreet. (2015). Life Satisfaction: The Key to Managing Internet & Social Media Addiction.. Americas Conference on Information Systems.10 indexed citations
Lin, Xiaolin, Mauricio Featherman, Stoney Brooks, & Nick Hajli. (2013). Do Interactivity and Vividness impact Objective and Subjective Claims of Online Product Presentation. Americas Conference on Information Systems.1 indexed citations
19.
Brooks, Stoney, et al.. (2012). Do Distractions and Interruptions Mitigate Online Impulse Purchasing?: An Empirical Investigation. Americas Conference on Information Systems.4 indexed citations
20.
Brooks, Stoney, Xuequn Wang, & Saonee Sarker. (2010). Unpacking Green IT: A Review of the Existing Literature. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 398.32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.