Steven L. Sheriff

809 total citations
19 papers, 630 citations indexed

About

Steven L. Sheriff is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven L. Sheriff has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 630 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Steven L. Sheriff's work include Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers). Steven L. Sheriff is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers). Steven L. Sheriff collaborates with scholars based in United States. Steven L. Sheriff's co-authors include Joshua J. Millspaugh, Chadwick D. Rittenhouse, Michael W. Hubbard, Robert A. Gitzen, Ryan M. Nielson, Lyman L. McDonald, John M. Marzluff, Lonnie P. Hansen, John R. Fischer and Jeff Beringer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Wildlife Management and Journal of Vegetation Science.

In The Last Decade

Steven L. Sheriff

18 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Steven L. Sheriff United States	12	505	209	171	89	69	19	630
Jacob L. Bowman United States	16	501 1.0×	193 0.9×	152 0.9×	96 1.1×	55 0.8×	55	681
Henry T. Smith United States	15	590 1.2×	277 1.3×	199 1.2×	130 1.5×	41 0.6×	54	757
Dean F. Stauffer United States	16	563 1.1×	298 1.4×	225 1.3×	97 1.1×	29 0.4×	33	762
Michael W. Hubbard United States	15	690 1.4×	183 0.9×	155 0.9×	174 2.0×	72 1.0×	19	792
Mark D. Smith United States	13	445 0.9×	113 0.5×	113 0.7×	67 0.8×	101 1.5×	36	634
Pilar Gaona Spain	9	774 1.5×	356 1.7×	132 0.8×	161 1.8×	65 0.9×	11	930
Adam A. Ahlers United States	13	442 0.9×	112 0.5×	115 0.7×	66 0.7×	69 1.0×	38	569
Hayato Iijima Japan	17	478 0.9×	266 1.3×	156 0.9×	111 1.2×	52 0.8×	58	762
Tony W. Mong United States	13	385 0.8×	87 0.4×	102 0.6×	87 1.0×	77 1.1×	29	471
Steven L. Cain United States	17	564 1.1×	66 0.3×	107 0.6×	92 1.0×	105 1.5×	25	666

Countries citing papers authored by Steven L. Sheriff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven L. Sheriff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven L. Sheriff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven L. Sheriff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven L. Sheriff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven L. Sheriff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven L. Sheriff. The network helps show where Steven L. Sheriff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven L. Sheriff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven L. Sheriff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven L. Sheriff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven L. Sheriff. Steven L. Sheriff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Sheriff, Steven L., et al.. (2018). Model selection for wild turkey hunter success rates using small‐area estimation methods. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 42(4). 622–631.

Sheriff, Steven L., et al.. (2013). THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF MISSOURI RIVER RECREATION: ESTIMATES FROM THE MISSOURI RIVER PUBLIC USE ASSESSMENT. River Research and Applications. 30(5). 639–649. 1 indexed citations

Hooten, Mevin B., et al.. (2009). Optimal spatio‐temporal hybrid sampling designs for ecological monitoring. Journal of Vegetation Science. 20(4). 639–649. 20 indexed citations

Barko, Valerie A., et al.. (2008). Evaluation of Turtle Exclusion and Escapement Devices for Hoop‐Nets. Journal of Wildlife Management. 72(7). 1628–1633. 25 indexed citations

Rittenhouse, Chadwick D., Joshua J. Millspaugh, Michael W. Hubbard, Steven L. Sheriff, & William D. Dijak. (2008). Resource Selection by Translocated Three‐Toed Box Turtles in Missouri. Journal of Wildlife Management. 72(1). 268–275. 17 indexed citations

Rittenhouse, Chadwick D., Joshua J. Millspaugh, Michael W. Hubbard, & Steven L. Sheriff. (2007). Movements of Translocated and Resident Three-toed Box Turtles. Journal of Herpetology. 41(1). 115–121. 52 indexed citations

Schulz, John H., et al.. (2007). Attitudes of Missouri Small Game Hunters Toward Nontoxic‐Shot Regulations. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71(2). 628–633. 11 indexed citations

Rittenhouse, Chadwick D., Joshua J. Millspaugh, Andrew B. Cooper, et al.. (2007). Modeling resource selection using polytomous logistic regression and kernel density estimates. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 15(1). 39–47. 8 indexed citations

Millspaugh, Joshua J., Ryan M. Nielson, Lyman L. McDonald, et al.. (2006). Analysis of Resource Selection Using Utilization Distributions. Journal of Wildlife Management. 70(2). 384–395. 202 indexed citations

10.

Sheriff, Steven L.. (2002). Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: the experiment. 227. 17 indexed citations

11.

Sun, Dongchu, et al.. (1999). Estimating Hunting Success Rates via Bayesian Generalized Linear Models. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics. 4(4). 456–456. 5 indexed citations

12.

Drobney, Ronald D., et al.. (1998). Mourning Dove nesting habitat and nest success in Central Missouri. Journal of Field Ornithology. 69(2). 299–305. 11 indexed citations

13.

Sheriff, Steven L., et al.. (1997). The experimental design of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project. 26–40. 25 indexed citations

14.

Schulz, John H., et al.. (1996). Adult Mourning Dove Survival during Spring/Summer in Northcentral Missouri. Journal of Wildlife Management. 60(1). 148–148. 7 indexed citations

15.

Beringer, Jeff, et al.. (1996). Factors Affecting Capture Myopathy in White-Tailed Deer. Journal of Wildlife Management. 60(2). 373–373. 116 indexed citations

16.

Schulz, John H., Steven L. Sheriff, Zhuoqiong He, et al.. (1995). Accuracy of Techniques Used to Assign Mourning Dove Age and Gender. Journal of Wildlife Management. 59(4). 759–759. 19 indexed citations

17.

Wenny, Daniel G., Richard L. Clawson, John Faaborg, & Steven L. Sheriff. (1993). Population Density, Habitat Selection and Minimum Area Requirements of Three Forest-Interior Warblers in Central Missouri. Ornithological Applications. 95(4). 968–979. 77 indexed citations

18.

Vangilder, Larry D., Steven L. Sheriff, & Gail S. Olson. (1990). CHARACTERISTICS, ATTITUDES, AND PREFERENCES OF MISSOURI'S SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1990(S1). 167–176. 1 indexed citations

19.

Humburg, Dale D., et al.. (1982). Shotshell and shooter effectiveness: Lead vs. steel shot for duck hunting. 10(2). 121–126. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact