Mark D. Smith

1.3k total citations
36 papers, 634 citations indexed

About

Mark D. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Small Animals and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark D. Smith has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 634 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Ecology, 11 papers in Small Animals and 8 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Mark D. Smith's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (22 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers). Mark D. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (22 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers). Mark D. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Mark D. Smith's co-authors include L. Wes Burger, L. Mike Conner, Hubert H. Attaway, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Kurt C. VerCauteren, Stephen J. Dinsmore, Kristine O. Evans, John J. Mayer, James C. Beasley and B. Martin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Mark D. Smith

31 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark D. Smith United States	13	445	113	113	101	101	36	634
Niccolò Fattorini Italy	15	454 1.0×	85 0.8×	54 0.5×	130 1.3×	49 0.5×	43	580
Mark P. Vrtiska United States	14	583 1.3×	125 1.1×	149 1.3×	28 0.3×	17 0.2×	49	706
William M. Giuliano United States	17	512 1.2×	186 1.6×	144 1.3×	38 0.4×	14 0.1×	55	688
Warren C. Conway United States	14	522 1.2×	190 1.7×	115 1.0×	37 0.4×	46 0.5×	81	670
Scott L. Findholt United States	12	421 0.9×	128 1.1×	49 0.4×	57 0.6×	35 0.3×	30	531
Emma Coulthard United Kingdom	11	136 0.3×	61 0.5×	33 0.3×	69 0.7×	51 0.5×	20	355
Sigbjørn Stokke Norway	14	558 1.3×	108 1.0×	53 0.5×	142 1.4×	111 1.1×	22	712
Ilka Reinhardt Germany	11	448 1.0×	54 0.5×	193 1.7×	93 0.9×	18 0.2×	21	661
Bruce B. Davitt United States	10	647 1.5×	258 2.3×	174 1.5×	41 0.4×	13 0.1×	12	849
Marian E. Vernon United States	6	242 0.5×	64 0.6×	145 1.3×	23 0.2×	69 0.7×	8	359

Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Smith. The network helps show where Mark D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark D. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark D. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark D. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark D. Smith. Mark D. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gitzen, Robert A., et al.. (2024). Response of white-tailed deer to removal of invasive wild pigs. Wildlife Research. 51(10).

Lepczyk, Christopher A., et al.. (2024). Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama. Environmental Management. 73(5). 1032–1048. 1 indexed citations

Smith, Mark D., et al.. (2023). First documentation of acorn consumption by eastern screech owl (Megascops asio). Food Webs. 37. e00306–e00306.

Bright, Alan D., et al.. (2023). Alabama agricultural producers’ experiences with wild pigs ( Sus scrofa ) and their preferences concerning wild pig management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 29(5). 540–544.

Smith, Mark D., et al.. (2023). Impacts of wild pigs on acorn availability as a food source for native wildlife. Wildlife Research. 50(12). 1123–1130. 4 indexed citations

Lockaby, B. Graeme, et al.. (2022). Wild pig removal reduces pathogenic bacteria in low-order streams. Biological Invasions. 24(5). 1453–1463. 6 indexed citations

Lepczyk, Christopher A., et al.. (2021). Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs. PLoS ONE. 16(2). e0246457–e0246457. 3 indexed citations

Morse, Wayde C., et al.. (2021). Socialization and motivational pathways among different groups of non-traditional hunters in Alabama reveal unique recruitment and retention opportunities. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 27(5). 407–421. 7 indexed citations

Lockaby, B. Graeme, et al.. (2021). Impacts of a large invasive mammal on water quality in riparian ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Quality. 50(2). 441–453. 10 indexed citations

10.

Gitzen, Robert A., et al.. (2020). Interactions of Soil and Vegetation Determine Habitat for Southeastern Pocket Gopher (Geomys pinetis). The American Midland Naturalist. 184(2). 205–221. 2 indexed citations

11.

Ditchkoff, Stephen S., et al.. (2019). Relative Efficacy of a Urine-based Lure for Attracting Wild Pigs. Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 6. 156–160. 1 indexed citations

12.

Ditchkoff, Stephen S., et al.. (2019). Annual Fire Return Interval Influences Nutritional Carrying Capacity of White-Tailed Deer in Pine–Hardwood Forests. Forest Science. 65(4). 483–491. 4 indexed citations

13.

Smith, Mark D., et al.. (2017). Population Response of Northern Bobwhite to Field Border Management Practices in Mississippi. National Quail Symposium Proceedings. 6. 2 indexed citations

14.

Riffell, Samuel K., Adrian P. Monroe, James A. Martin, et al.. (2014). Response of non‐grassland avian guilds to adjacent herbaceous field buffers: testing the configuration of targeted conservation practices in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology. 52(2). 300–309. 16 indexed citations

15.

Smith, Mark D., et al.. (2013). Effects of Opportunistic Shooting on Trap Visitation by Wild Pigs. Insecta mundi. 1 indexed citations

16.

Evans, Kristine O., L. Wes Burger, C. S. Oedekoven, et al.. (2013). Multi‐region response to conservation buffers targeted for northern bobwhite. Journal of Wildlife Management. 77(4). 716–725. 19 indexed citations

17.

Dinsmore, Stephen J. & Mark D. Smith. (2010). Mountain Plover Responses to Plague in Montana. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 10(1). 37–45. 9 indexed citations

18.

Conner, L. Mike, Mark D. Smith, & L. Wes Burger. (2005). A COMPARISON OF DISTANCE-BASED AND CLASSIFICATION-BASED ANALYSES OF HABITAT USE: REPLY. Ecology. 86(11). 3125–3129. 19 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Mark D., et al.. (2005). DENSITY AND DIVERSITY OF OVERWINTERING BIRDS IN MANAGED FIELD BORDERS IN MISSISSIPPI. The Wilson Bulletin. 117(3). 258–269. 29 indexed citations

20.

Conner, L. Mike, Mark D. Smith, & L. Wes Burger. (2003). A COMPARISON OF DISTANCE-BASED AND CLASSIFICATION-BASED ANALYSES OF HABITAT USE. Ecology. 84(2). 526–531. 178 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact