William D. Dijak

2.1k total citations
27 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

William D. Dijak is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, William D. Dijak has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 16 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 11 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in William D. Dijak's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers). William D. Dijak is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers). William D. Dijak collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Switzerland. William D. Dijak's co-authors include Frank R. Thompson, Stephen R. Shifley, Hong S. He, Wen J. Wang, Jacob S. Fraser, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Michael Larson, David A. Hamilton, Brice B. Hanberry and Christine A. Howell and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Journal of Ecology.

In The Last Decade

William D. Dijak

27 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

William D. Dijak
James R. Strittholt United States
Joseph L. Ganey United States
Monique E. Rocca United States
Gavin M. Jones United States
Elizabeth L. Kalies United States
Brenda C. McComb United States
Julian C. Fox Australia
James R. Strittholt United States
William D. Dijak
Citations per year, relative to William D. Dijak William D. Dijak (= 1×) peers James R. Strittholt

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Dijak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Dijak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Dijak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Dijak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Dijak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Dijak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Dijak. The network helps show where William D. Dijak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William D. Dijak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William D. Dijak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William D. Dijak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William D. Dijak. William D. Dijak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Wen J., et al.. (2019). Climate change and tree harvest interact to affect future tree species distribution changes. Journal of Ecology. 107(4). 1901–1917. 46 indexed citations
2.
Wang, Wen J., Frank R. Thompson, Hong S. He, et al.. (2018). Population dynamics has greater effects than climate change on tree species distribution in a temperate forest region. Journal of Biogeography. 45(12). 2766–2778. 25 indexed citations
3.
He, Hong S., Frank R. Thompson, Wen J. Wang, et al.. (2017). Future forest aboveground carbon dynamics in the central United States: the importance of forest demographic processes. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 41821–41821. 14 indexed citations
4.
Iverson, Louis R., Frank R. Thompson, Stephen N. Matthews, et al.. (2016). Multi-model comparison on the effects of climate change on tree species in the eastern U.S.: results from an enhanced niche model and process-based ecosystem and landscape models. Landscape Ecology. 32(7). 1327–1346. 51 indexed citations
5.
Dijak, William D., Brice B. Hanberry, Jacob S. Fraser, et al.. (2016). Revision and application of the LINKAGES model to simulate forest growth in central hardwood landscapes in response to climate change. Landscape Ecology. 32(7). 1365–1384. 37 indexed citations
6.
Thogmartin, Wayne E., et al.. (2016). Assessing the sensitivity of avian species abundance to land cover and climate. Ecosphere. 7(6). 11 indexed citations
7.
Wang, Wen J., Hong S. He, Frank R. Thompson, Jacob S. Fraser, & William D. Dijak. (2016). Changes in forest biomass and tree species distribution under climate change in the northeastern United States. Landscape Ecology. 32(7). 1399–1413. 86 indexed citations
8.
Thompson, Frank R., et al.. (2016). Bird response to future climate and forest management focused on mitigating climate change. Landscape Ecology. 32(7). 1433–1446. 11 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Wen J., Hong S. He, Frank R. Thompson, et al.. (2015). Importance of succession, harvest, and climate change in determining future composition in U.S. Central Hardwood Forests. Ecosphere. 6(12). 1–18. 68 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Wen J., Hong S. He, Frank R. Thompson, Jacob S. Fraser, & William D. Dijak. (2015). Landscape- and regional-scale shifts in forest composition under climate change in the Central Hardwood Region of the United States. Landscape Ecology. 31(1). 149–163. 22 indexed citations
12.
Wang, Wen J., Hong S. He, Martín A. Spetich, et al.. (2014). A framework for evaluating forest landscape model predictions using empirical data and knowledge. Environmental Modelling & Software. 62. 230–239. 38 indexed citations
13.
Dijak, William D.. (2013). Landscape Builder: Software for the creation of initial landscapes for LANDIS from FIA data. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23 indexed citations
14.
Rittenhouse, Chadwick D., Frank R. Thompson, William D. Dijak, Joshua J. Millspaugh, & Richard L. Clawson. (2010). Evaluation of Habitat Suitability Models for Forest Passerines Using Demographic Data. Journal of Wildlife Management. 74(3). 411–422. 13 indexed citations
15.
Zhang, Yangjian, Hong S. He, William D. Dijak, et al.. (2009). Integration of Satellite Imagery and Forest Inventory in Mapping Dominant and Associated Species at a Regional Scale. Environmental Management. 44(2). 312–323. 17 indexed citations
16.
Shifley, Stephen R., Frank R. Thompson, William D. Dijak, Michael Larson, & Joshua J. Millspaugh. (2006). Simulated effects of forest management alternatives on landscape structure and habitat suitability in the Midwestern United States. Forest Ecology and Management. 229(1-3). 361–377. 67 indexed citations
17.
Howell, Christine A., William D. Dijak, & Frank R. Thompson. (2006). Landscape context and selection for forest edge by breeding Brown-headed Cowbirds. Landscape Ecology. 22(2). 273–284. 45 indexed citations
18.
Larson, Michael, Frank R. Thompson, Joshua J. Millspaugh, William D. Dijak, & Stephen R. Shifley. (2004). Linking population viability, habitat suitability, and landscape simulation models for conservation planning. Ecological Modelling. 180(1). 103–118. 146 indexed citations
19.
Shifley, Stephen R., Frank R. Thompson, David R. Larsen, & William D. Dijak. (2000). Modeling forest landscape change in the Missouri Ozarks under alternative management practices. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 27(1-3). 7–24. 57 indexed citations
20.
Thompson, Frank R., et al.. (1992). Breeding Bird Populations in Missouri Ozark Forests with and without Clearcutting. Journal of Wildlife Management. 56(1). 23–23. 109 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026