Citations per year, relative to Steven J. Fenves Steven J. Fenves (= 1×)
peers
Christiaan J. J. Paredis
Countries citing papers authored by Steven J. Fenves
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven J. Fenves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven J. Fenves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven J. Fenves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven J. Fenves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven J. Fenves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven J. Fenves. The network helps show where Steven J. Fenves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven J. Fenves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven J. Fenves.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven J. Fenves based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steven J. Fenves. Steven J. Fenves is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lee, Jae Hoon, Steven J. Fenves, Conrad Bock, et al.. (2012). A Semantic Product Modeling Framework and Its Application for Behavior Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 9(1).3 indexed citations
7.
Abudayyeh, Osama, Hubo Cai, Steven J. Fenves, et al.. (2003). Role of Computing: Practitioners' Perspective (2002).1 indexed citations
8.
Garrett, James H., et al.. (1995). A Broker for Delivering and Accessing Environmental Regulations. Computing in Civil Engineering. 36–43.1 indexed citations
9.
Fenves, Steven J.. (1995). An Interdisciplinary Course in Engineering Synthesis. Computing in Civil Engineering. 433–440.3 indexed citations
10.
Fenves, Steven J., et al.. (1994). Representation and Processing of Design Standards: a Bifurcation between Research and Practice. 122–127.3 indexed citations
11.
Julien, Benoı̂t & Steven J. Fenves. (1993). An Environmental Evaluation Learning System. 1155–1162.2 indexed citations
12.
Sriram, D., Mary Lou Maher, & Steven J. Fenves. (1985). Trends in engineering software and hardwareKnowledge-based expert systems in structural design. Computers & Structures. 20.27 indexed citations
13.
Fenves, Steven J., Mary Lou Maher, & D. Sriram. (1984). Expert Systems: C. E. Potential. Civil engineering. 54(10). 44–47.14 indexed citations
14.
Rasdorf, William & Steven J. Fenves. (1983). Organization of a Structural Design Database. 559–571.3 indexed citations
15.
Law, Kincho H. & Steven J. Fenves. (1981). Sparse Matrices, Graph Theory, and Reanalysis. Computing in Civil Engineering. 234–249.7 indexed citations
16.
Fenves, Steven J.. (1973). Numerical and Computer Methods in Structural Mechanics: Proceedings.1 indexed citations
Fenves, Steven J., et al.. (1970). Computer-Aided Processing Of Structural Design Specifications. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). 763–799.7 indexed citations
19.
Fenves, Steven J., et al.. (1969). DATA STRUCTURE FOR A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Highway Research Record.1 indexed citations
20.
Fenves, Steven J., Anestis S. Veletsos, & C.P. Siess. (1962). DYNAMIC STUDIES OF THE AASHO ROAD TEST BRIDGES. Highway Research Board Special Report.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.