This map shows the geographic impact of D. Sriram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Sriram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Sriram more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Sriram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Sriram. The network helps show where D. Sriram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Sriram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Sriram.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Sriram based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Sriram. D. Sriram is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jayachandran, Praveen, et al.. (1995). NOVEL DESIGN ALGORITHMS FOR K FACTOR CALCULATION AND BEAM-COLUMN SELECTION. DISCUSSION. Journal of Structural Engineering. 121(2).1 indexed citations
4.
Ahmed, Shamim, et al.. (1992). Object-oriented database management systems for engineering: a comparison. Journal of Object-oriented Programming. 5(3). 27–44.28 indexed citations
5.
Sriram, D., et al.. (1992). Artificial intelligence in engineering design (Volume I): design representation and models of routine design.6 indexed citations
6.
Sriram, D., et al.. (1992). Artificial intelligence in engineering design (Vol. II): models of innovative design, reasoning about physical systems, and reasoning about geometry.4 indexed citations
7.
Sriram, D., et al.. (1992). Artificial intelligence in engineering design (Volume III): knowledge acquisition, commercial systems, and integrated environments.6 indexed citations
Sriram, D., et al.. (1991). Computer-Aided Cooperative Product Development: Mit-JSME Workshop, Mit, Cambridge, U. S. A. November 20-21, 1989 Proceedings. Springer eBooks.3 indexed citations
Sriram, D., Robert D. Logcher, & Shuichi Fukuda. (1991). Proceedings of the MIT-JSME workshop on Computer-aided cooperative product development.4 indexed citations
12.
Kausel, Edgar E., et al.. (1990). OSEIS: a system for deriving qualitative seismic behavior of structural systems from structural descriptions. Ellis Horwood eBooks. 15–35.1 indexed citations
13.
Sriram, D., et al.. (1989). Knowledge-Based Expert Systems in Engineering - An Annotated Bibliography.. ACM SIGART Bulletin. 109. 38–89.1 indexed citations
14.
Kausel, Eduardo, et al.. (1989). A Knowledge Based System for Deriving Qualitative Seismic Behavior. 418–427.5 indexed citations
15.
Sriram, D.. (1988). Handbook of industrial robotics. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering. 3(1). 51–52.5 indexed citations
16.
Sriram, D. & R. A. Adey. (1987). Knowledge based expert systems in engineering : planning and design.38 indexed citations
17.
Adey, R. A. & D. Sriram. (1987). Artificial Intelligence in Engineering: Tools and Techniques. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 61(1). 8–15.13 indexed citations
18.
Sriram, D., Mary Lou Maher, & Steven J. Fenves. (1985). Trends in engineering software and hardwareKnowledge-based expert systems in structural design. Computers & Structures. 20.27 indexed citations
Fenves, Steven J., Mary Lou Maher, & D. Sriram. (1984). Expert Systems: C. E. Potential. Civil engineering. 54(10). 44–47.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.