Xenia Fiorentini

567 citations
15 papers · 280 indexed · h-index 6

Xenia Fiorentini

15 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Xenia Fiorentini
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 185
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 54
  • Management Information Systems 58
  • Artificial Intelligence 119
  • Software 12
Replace Raphaël Barbau with:
Raphaël Barbau United States
Sylvère Krima United States
H. Craig Howard United States
V. Xanthakis Greece
Thurston Sexton United States
Felix Ocker Germany
Radmehr P. Monfared United Kingdom
Tom Wanyama Canada
Peter Katranuschkov Germany
Ajit Pardasani Canada
Xenia Fiorentini relative to Raphaël Barbau United States Raphaël Barbau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Raphaël Barbau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xenia Fiorentini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xenia Fiorentini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xenia Fiorentini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xenia Fiorentini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xenia Fiorentini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xenia Fiorentini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xenia Fiorentini. The network helps show where Xenia Fiorentini may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Xenia Fiorentini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xenia Fiorentini Line = papers co-authored together Xenia Fiorentini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201415
2
Modeling nuclear power plants engineering data using ISO 15926
20132
3
A Semantic Product Modeling Framework and Its Application for Behavior Evaluation
20123
4 2012173
5 201125
6
OntoSTEP: Enriching Product Model Data Using Ontologies | NIST
20102
7 201024
8 20103
9 20099
10 20092
11
OntoSTEP: OWL-DL Ontology for STEP | NIST
20091
12 20094
13 20093
14
An Evaluation of Description Logic for the Development of Product Models | NIST
20081
15 200813

About Xenia Fiorentini

Xenia Fiorentini is a scholar working on Software, Management Information Systems and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (5 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (4 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (3 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (185 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (54 citations) and Management Information Systems (58 citations). Xenia Fiorentini has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Ram D. Sriram, Sudarsan Rachuri, Anantha Narayanan, Raphaël Barbau, Sylvère Krima, Sebti Foufou, Hyo-Won Suh, Steven J. Fenves, Jae Hoon Lee and Conrad Bock.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026