Steve Thomas

17 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers

Steve Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 108
  • Physiology 163
  • Surgery 263
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 119
  • Organic Chemistry 90
Replace Audrey Langlois with:
Audrey Langlois France
El‐Sayed El‐Awady Egypt
R. Knopp United States
Maria Azrad United States
Anne Perez United States
G J Boerma Netherlands
D. Petzinna Germany
Fausta Micheletta Italy
Thomas Dayspring United States
Steve Thomas relative to Audrey Langlois France Audrey Langlois's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Audrey Langlois · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Thomas. The network helps show where Steve Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Steve Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2008317
2 200696
3 201123
4 201014
5 201112
6 20129
7 20097
8 19917
9 20006
10
Whatever happened to the social documentary
20025
11
Introduction to the Digital Library
20065
12 20224
13
Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and the future of library systems
20064
14
Strange Birds in Paradise - a West Papuan Story
20101
15
Upfront filmmaking: The ethics of documentary relationships
20121
16
Importing MARC data into DSpace
20061
17 20001
18
The digital library : current perspectives and future directions
20051

About Steve Thomas

Steve Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Surgery, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Spectroscopy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (108 citations), Physiology (163 citations), Surgery (263 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (119 citations) and Organic Chemistry (90 citations). Steve Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Lewis, Henning Andersen, Simon Goodacre, Emanuela Gancia, Kevin J. Merchant, Alexander C. Humphries, David J. Hallett, Claire Beaumont, Darren Robertson and Simon McHugh. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and New Review of Film and Television Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact