Steve Matthews

1.4k citations
51 papers · 765 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Steve Matthews

46 papers receiving 689 citations

Peers

Steve Matthews
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Geometry and Topology 141
  • Philosophy 76
  • Developmental Neuroscience 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 103
  • Safety Research 42
Replace A. A. Albert with:
A. A. Albert United States
Andreas Hergovich Austria
Jason M. Tangen Australia
Zita Oravecz United States
Dale J. Cohen United States
Prentice Starkey United States
Clinton B. De Soto United States
Glenn Lawyer Germany
Charles Crawford Canada
J. Arthur Woodward United States
Steve Matthews relative to A. A. Albert United States A. A. Albert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.2×
A. A. Albert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Matthews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Matthews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Matthews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Matthews. The network helps show where Steve Matthews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Matthews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Matthews Line = papers co-authored together Steve Matthews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017122
2 2008110
3 2009106
4 201347
5
Brucella suis infection associated with feral swine hunting - Three States, 2007-2008.
200943
6 200041
7 201831
8 200130
9 201530
10 200428
11 200517
12 200315
13 200215
14
Anonymity and the social self
201013
15 200811
16 20139
17 20039
18 20048
19 20088
20 20217

About Steve Matthews

Steve Matthews is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 51 papers that have together received 765 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (141 citations), Philosophy (76 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (103 citations) and Safety Research (42 citations). Steve Matthews has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anke Snoek, Ralph Kopperman, Jeanette Kennett, Homeira Pajoohesh, Robyn Dwyer, Michael A. Bukatin, Dean Cocking, Liisa A.M. Galea, J. Martin Wojtowicz and Rudy Boonstra. Their work appears in journals such as Northern History, Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology, Neuroethics, Philosophical Psychology and Journal of Applied Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact