Neuroethics

512 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 512 papers published in Neuroethics in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuroethics usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (381 papers), Clinical Psychology (114 papers) and Philosophy (91 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (234 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (123 papers) and Free Will and Agency (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuroethics are Frédéric Gilbert, Felicitas Kraemer, Éric Racine, Françoise Βaylis, Julian Savulescu, Marc D. Lewis, Cordelia Fine, Maartje Schermer, Hanna Pickard and Cynthia Forlini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuroethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuroethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuroethics.

Countries where authors publish in Neuroethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuroethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuroethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuroethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025