Dag Elgesem

1.3k total citations
29 papers, 723 citations indexed

About

Dag Elgesem is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Dag Elgesem has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 723 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Communication and 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Dag Elgesem's work include Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (5 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers). Dag Elgesem is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (5 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers). Dag Elgesem collaborates with scholars based in Norway, Germany and Denmark. Dag Elgesem's co-authors include Nicholas Diakopoulos, Helen Kennedy, Ketil Stølen, Cristina Miguel, Charles Ess, Bjørnar Solhaug, Marika Lüders, Geoffrey Brennan, Seumas Miller and Elisabeth Staksrud and has published in prestigious journals such as New Media & Society, Lecture notes in computer science and Synthese.

In The Last Decade

Dag Elgesem

26 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dag Elgesem Norway 14 415 234 116 75 67 29 723
Mario Haim Germany 15 564 1.4× 439 1.9× 197 1.7× 97 1.3× 77 1.1× 47 977
Stine Lomborg Denmark 17 513 1.2× 327 1.4× 82 0.7× 111 1.5× 88 1.3× 48 1.1k
Meredith Broussard United States 9 266 0.6× 159 0.7× 143 1.2× 226 3.0× 71 1.1× 15 738
Mykola Makhortykh Switzerland 18 472 1.1× 339 1.4× 207 1.8× 82 1.1× 137 2.0× 89 910
Aleksandra Urman Switzerland 14 439 1.1× 345 1.5× 179 1.5× 41 0.5× 65 1.0× 50 697
Cornelius Puschmann Germany 18 434 1.0× 428 1.8× 168 1.4× 48 0.6× 109 1.6× 48 912
Judith Moeller Netherlands 16 508 1.2× 474 2.0× 120 1.0× 118 1.6× 61 0.9× 28 847
Ronald E. Robertson United States 16 775 1.9× 423 1.8× 323 2.8× 133 1.8× 184 2.7× 31 1.2k
Carsten Schwemmer Germany 11 315 0.8× 144 0.6× 76 0.7× 23 0.3× 23 0.3× 21 549
Wu Youyou United States 7 360 0.9× 73 0.3× 167 1.4× 54 0.7× 78 1.2× 8 911

Countries citing papers authored by Dag Elgesem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dag Elgesem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dag Elgesem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dag Elgesem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dag Elgesem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dag Elgesem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dag Elgesem. The network helps show where Dag Elgesem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dag Elgesem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dag Elgesem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dag Elgesem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dag Elgesem. Dag Elgesem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Elgesem, Dag & Michael Brüggemann. (2022). Polarisation or just differences in opinion: How and why Facebook users disagree about Greta Thunberg. European Journal of Communication. 38(3). 237–254. 5 indexed citations
2.
Haim, Mario, Michael Karlsson, Raul Ferrer Conill, et al.. (2021). You Should Read This Study! It Investigates Scandinavian Social Media Logics ☝. Digital Journalism. 9(4). 406–426. 20 indexed citations
3.
Conill, Raul Ferrer, Michael Karlsson, Mario Haim, et al.. (2021). Toward ‘Cultures of Engagement’? An exploratory comparison of engagement patterns on Facebook news posts. New Media & Society. 25(1). 95–118. 14 indexed citations
4.
Brüggemann, Michael, et al.. (2020). Mutual Group Polarization in the Blogosphere: Tracking the Hoax Discourse on Climate Change. International journal of communication. 14. 24. 19 indexed citations
5.
Schmid-Petri, Hannah, Ueli Reber, Dorothee Arlt, et al.. (2019). A Dynamic Perspective on Publics and Counterpublics: The Role of the Blogosphere in Pushing the Issue of Climate Change During the 2016 US Presidential Campaign. Environmental Communication. 14(3). 378–390. 3 indexed citations
6.
Elgesem, Dag. (2019). The Meaning of Links: On the interpretation of hyperlinks in the study of polarization in blogging about climate change. Nordicom review/NORDICOM review. 40(s1). 65–78. 8 indexed citations
7.
Elgesem, Dag, Charles Ess, Anders Olof Larsson, et al.. (2016). Internet Research Ethics. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library). 41 indexed citations
8.
Elgesem, Dag, Charles Ess, Anders Olof Larsson, et al.. (2016). Internet Research Ethics. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library). 2 indexed citations
9.
Elgesem, Dag, et al.. (2016). Bloggers’ Responses to the Snowden Affair: Combining Automated and Manual Methods in the Analysis of News Blogging. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 25(2-3). 167–191. 10 indexed citations
10.
Elgesem, Dag, et al.. (2014). Structure and Content of the Discourse on Climate Change in the Blogosphere: The Big Picture. Environmental Communication. 9(2). 169–188. 90 indexed citations
11.
Diakopoulos, Nicholas, et al.. (2014). Identifying and Analyzing Moral Evaluation Frames in Climate Change Blog Discourse. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 8(1). 583–586. 14 indexed citations
12.
Ågotnes, Thomas, Jan Broersen, & Dag Elgesem. (2012). Deontic Logic in Computer Science: 11th International Conference, DEON 2012, Bergen, Norway, July 16-18, 2012. Springer eBooks.
13.
Elgesem, Dag & Jan Broersen. (2012). Deontic Logic in Computer Science. Lecture notes in computer science. 4 indexed citations
14.
Ågotnes, Thomas, Jan Broersen, & Dag Elgesem. (2012). Deontic logic in computer science : 11th International Conference, DEON 2012, Bergen, Norway, July 16-18, 2012 : proceedings. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations
15.
Hoven, Jeroen van den, Terrell Ward Bynum, James H. Moor, et al.. (2008). Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 110 indexed citations
16.
Elgesem, Dag. (2008). Search engines and the public use of reason. Ethics and Information Technology. 10(4). 233–242. 21 indexed citations
17.
Solhaug, Bjørnar, Dag Elgesem, & Ketil Stølen. (2007). Specifying Policies Using UML Sequence Diagrams--An Evaluation Based on a Case Study. 17. 19–28. 5 indexed citations
18.
Solhaug, Bjørnar, Dag Elgesem, & Ketil Stølen. (2007). Why Trust is not Proportional to Risk. 11–18. 30 indexed citations
19.
Elgesem, Dag. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research?. Ethics and Information Technology. 4(3). 195–203. 60 indexed citations
20.
Elgesem, Dag. (1990). Intentions, actions and routines: A problem in Krister Segerberg's theory of action. Synthese. 85(1). 153–177. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026