Steve Koh
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 4
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 1
- Health 2
- Social Media in Health Education 2
- Co-authors
- Michael B. First (5 shared papers)David W. Oslin (6 shared papers)Lisa B. Dixon (6 shared papers)David A. Adler (5 shared papers)Aaron Krasner (1 shared paper)David Cochran (1 shared paper)Venkat Bhat (1 shared paper)Frederick J. P. Langheim (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (5 papers)American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (3 papers)Psychiatric Services (2 papers)Psychiatry Research (2 papers)Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaCanada
In The Last Decade
Steve Koh
23 papers receiving 353 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Clinical Psychology 122
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
- Psychiatry and Mental health 36
- Health 13
- Applied Psychology 4
Countries citing papers authored by Steve Koh
This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Koh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Koh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Koh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Koh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Koh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Koh. The network helps show where Steve Koh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Koh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 1 |
About Steve Koh
Steve Koh is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology, Philosophy and General Health Professions, having authored 25 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Social Media in Health Education (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper) and Sex work and related issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (122 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (36 citations), Health (13 citations) and Applied Psychology (4 citations). Steve Koh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael B. First, David W. Oslin, Lisa B. Dixon, David A. Adler, Aaron Krasner, David Cochran, Venkat Bhat, Frederick J. P. Langheim, Dilip V. Jeste and Daniel D. Sewell. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services, Psychiatry Research and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.