Steve J. Jacobsen

15 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers

Steve J. Jacobsen
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 228
  • Pharmacology 170
  • Physiology 231
  • Organic Chemistry 89
  • Molecular Biology 206
Replace Gregor Larbig with:
Gregor Larbig Germany
Zhao Ren United States
Sean M. Spring United States
Morihisa Saitoh Japan
Jia‐Ning Xiang China
Alison R. Gregro United States
Elizabeth Smith LaBell United States
Carsten Krantz Switzerland
Richard A. Brier United States
Isak Im South Korea
Steve J. Jacobsen relative to Gregor Larbig Germany Gregor Larbig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Gregor Larbig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve J. Jacobsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve J. Jacobsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve J. Jacobsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve J. Jacobsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve J. Jacobsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve J. Jacobsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve J. Jacobsen. The network helps show where Steve J. Jacobsen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve J. Jacobsen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve J. Jacobsen Line = papers co-authored together Steve J. Jacobsen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2009123
2 200692
3 200992
4 200759
5 201044
6 200538
7 200731
8 200923
9 201917
10 200810
11
Beta-adrenergic ligand binding to receptors on human erythrocytes and lymphocytes.
19834
12 20082
13 20041
14
Natural language processing or ICD-9 diagnostic codes: Which is better at identifying patients with stable angina pectoris?
20061
15 20081

About Steve J. Jacobsen

Steve J. Jacobsen is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Physiology, Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (1 paper) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (228 citations), Pharmacology (170 citations), Physiology (231 citations), Organic Chemistry (89 citations) and Molecular Biology (206 citations). Steve J. Jacobsen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Menelas N. Pangalos, Peter H. Reinhart, Kristi Yi Fan, Andrea M. Olland, Michael S. Malamas, Albert J. Robichaud, Erik J. Wagner, Jim Turner, Jonathan Bard and Yun Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Annals of Epidemiology and Journal of Immunological Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact