Stephen Watterson
Impact in
- Law top 5%
- Legal principles and applications
- European and International Contract Law
- Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
-
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Papers in
- Law 10
- Legal principles and applications 7
- European and International Contract Law 5
- Property Rights and Legal Doctrine 3
-
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction 2
- Journals
- The Cambridge Law Journal (2 papers)Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (1 paper)Current Legal Problems (1 paper)European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht (3 papers)London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Watterson
11 papers receiving 18 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 8
- Law 25
- Economics and Econometrics 16
- Pharmacy 2
- Strategy and Management 7
- Cognitive Neuroscience 7
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Watterson
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Watterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Watterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Watterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Watterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Watterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Watterson. The network helps show where Stephen Watterson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Watterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goff Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment | 2016 | 6 |
| 2 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 3 | Subrogation law and practice | 2007 | 3 |
| 4 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 5 | Alternative and cumulative remedies: what is the difference? | 2003 | 2 |
| 6 | The law of unjust enrichment | 2011 | 1 |
| 7 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 8 | Testing the boundaries of conversion: account-holders, intangible property and economic harm | 2012 | 1 |
| 9 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 12 | Remedies for Knowing Receipt | 2010 | 1 |
| 13 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 0 |
About Stephen Watterson
Stephen Watterson is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting, having authored 14 papers that have together received 26 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (7 papers), European and International Contract Law (5 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (3 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (2 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 papers) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (25 citations), Economics and Econometrics (16 citations), Pharmacy (2 citations), Strategy and Management (7 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (7 citations). Stephen Watterson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles Mitchell and Andrea Pinna. Their work appears in journals such as The Cambridge Law Journal, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Current Legal Problems, European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht and London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.