Current Legal Problems

593 papers and 2.9k indexed citations

About

The 593 papers published in Current Legal Problems in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Legal Problems usually cover Law (306 papers), Political Science and International Relations (229 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (83 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (174 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (87 papers) and European and International Contract Law (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Legal Problems are Julia Black, Georg Schwarzenberger, Michael Freeman, Lucia Zedner, Genevra Richardson, David Nelken, Paul Matthews, Rosemary Hunter, Nicola Lacey and Gráinne de Búrca.

In The Last Decade

Current Legal Problems

406 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Current Legal Problems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Legal Problems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Legal Problems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Legal Problems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Legal Problems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Legal Problems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Legal Problems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026