Countries citing papers authored by Charles Mitchell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Mitchell. The network helps show where Charles Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Mitchell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Mitchell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Mitchell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Mitchell. Charles Mitchell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (2021). Trustee Recoupment: A Power Analysis. UCL Discovery (University College London).
2.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (2018). Beneficiaries' Consent to Trustees' Unauthorised Acts. SSRN Electronic Journal.
3.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (2018). The Silent Spring. 6(1).15 indexed citations
4.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (2015). Hayton and Mitchell: Text, Cases and Materials on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies.3 indexed citations
5.
Burrows, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Principles of the English law of obligations. Oxford University Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
Goudkamp, James & Charles Mitchell. (2013). Denials and Defences in the Law of Unjust Enrichment. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA).1 indexed citations
8.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (2013). Restitution of Overpaid Tax.1 indexed citations
9.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (2011). The law of unjust enrichment. Sweet & Maxwell eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Mitchell, Charles. (2010). Recovery of Ultra Vires Payments by Public Bodies. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
11.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (2010). Burón v Denman (1848). SSRN Electronic Journal. 33–68.
12.
Mitchell, Charles. (2010). Constructive and resulting trusts.4 indexed citations
13.
Mitchell, Charles & Stephen Watterson. (2007). Subrogation.1 indexed citations
Mitchell, Charles. (2004). Shareholders' Claims for Reflective Loss. Research Portal (King's College London). 120. 457–479.1 indexed citations
16.
Mitchell, Charles. (1977). The Shakespeare circle : a life of Dr. John Hall, Shakespeare's son-in-law, with glimpses of their intimate friends and relations.1 indexed citations
17.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (1976). Cyriacus of Ancona's journeys in the Propontis and the Northern Aegean, 1444-1445.7 indexed citations
18.
Mitchell, Charles, et al.. (1963). Pirro Ligorio's Roman antiquities : the drawings in Ms XIII.B.7 in the National Library in Naples.9 indexed citations
19.
Mitchell, Charles. (1961). A fifteenth century Italian Plutarch (British Museum Add. MS. 22318). Faber and Faber eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.