William Swadling

582 total citations
14 papers, 51 citations indexed

About

William Swadling is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, William Swadling has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 51 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Law, 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in William Swadling's work include Legal principles and applications (11 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (3 papers) and European and International Contract Law (3 papers). William Swadling is often cited by papers focused on Legal principles and applications (11 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (3 papers) and European and International Contract Law (3 papers). William Swadling collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. William Swadling's co-authors include Gareth Jones, Zhicheng Wu, Kit Barker, Hanoch Dagan, Gerhard Dannemann, Sonja Meier, Mindy Chen-Wishart, David Johnston, David Johnston and Graham Virgo and has published in prestigious journals such as Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Legal Studies and Current Legal Problems.

In The Last Decade

William Swadling

11 papers receiving 43 citations

Peers

William Swadling

LAW

EE

CN

PSIR

PHILO

Stephen Watterson United Kingdom

Warren Swain Australia

Charles Edwin Rickett Australia

Ralph Cunnington United Kingdom

Roger Halson United Kingdom

Lisa A. Eichhorn United States

W. S. Ferguson

Thurman W. Arnold United States

Max Farrand

Fernando Flores García Chile

Stephen Watterson United Kingdom

William Swadling

25 ×0.5

LAW

16 ×0.6

EE

7 ×0.6

CN

3 ×0.3

PSIR

0 ×0.0

PHILO

Citations per year, relative to William Swadling William Swadling (= 1×) peers Stephen Watterson

Countries citing papers authored by William Swadling

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Swadling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Swadling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Swadling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Swadling

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Swadling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Swadling. The network helps show where William Swadling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Swadling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Swadling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Swadling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Swadling. William Swadling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Wu, Zhicheng & William Swadling. (2021). Unjustified enrichment in the Chinese Civil Code: questions from the common law. Asia Pacific Law Review. 29(2). 402–421. 2 indexed citations

2.

Swadling, William. (2016). Substance and procedure in equity. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).

3.

Swadling, William. (2016). Trusts and Ownership: A Common Law Perspective. European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht. 24(Issue 6). 951–972.

4.

Swadling, William. (2012). Constructive trusts and breach of fiduciary duty. Trusts & Trustees. 18(10). 985–999. 2 indexed citations

5.

Swadling, William. (2011). The Fiction of the Constructive Trust. Current Legal Problems. 64(1). 399–433. 4 indexed citations

6.

Swadling, William. (2010). The Nature of the Trust in Rochefoucauld v Boustead. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 1 indexed citations

7.

Swadling, William, et al.. (2008). Rescission, Property, and Common Law. 477–533. 6 indexed citations

8.

Swadling, William. (2008). Policy arguments for proprietary restitution. Legal Studies. 28(4). 506–530. 4 indexed citations

9.

Swadling, William. (2008). Ignorance and Unjust Enrichment: The Problem of Title. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 28(4). 627–658. 6 indexed citations

10.

Barker, Kit, et al.. (2004). The new Birksian approach to unjust enrichment. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 12. 260–265. 3 indexed citations

11.

Johnston, David, David Johnston, Sonja Meier, et al.. (2002). Unjustified Enrichment. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations

12.

Swadling, William, et al.. (1999). The search for principle : essays in honour of Lord Goff of Chieveley. Oxford University Press eBooks. 10 indexed citations

13.

Swadling, William. (1996). A new role for resulting trusts?. Legal Studies. 16(1). 110–131. 7 indexed citations

14.

Swadling, William. (1988). Liability for Negligent Refusal of Unemployment Benefit. Public law. 328–339. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact