Stephen Tully

512 citations
22 papers · 345 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Tully

22 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Stephen Tully
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Otorhinolaryngology 29
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 107
  • Aerospace Engineering 121
  • Biomedical Engineering 152
  • Control and Systems Engineering 63
Replace Mahdi Azizian with:
Mahdi Azizian United States
Diana C. W. Friedman United States
Zhaoshuo Li United States
B.L. Musits United States
Dennis Kundrat Germany
D. Larose United States
J. Zuhars United States
Baoliang Zhao China
Wuzhou Hong China
Christoph Hennersperger Germany
Stephen Tully relative to Mahdi Azizian United States Mahdi Azizian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mahdi Azizian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Tully

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Tully's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Tully with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Tully more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Tully

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Tully. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Tully. The network helps show where Stephen Tully may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Tully, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Tully Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Tully links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201258
2 201357
3 201137
4 200825
5 200920
6 201219
7 201516
8 201414
9 200714
10 201213
11 201112
12 200911
13 201110
14 201210
15 201310
16 20117
17 20115
18 20102
19 20122
20 20111

About Stephen Tully

Stephen Tully is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (15 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (8 papers), Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies (5 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (4 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (4 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers) and Robot Manipulation and Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (29 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (107 citations), Aerospace Engineering (121 citations), Biomedical Engineering (152 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (63 citations). Stephen Tully has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Howie Choset, George Kantor, Marco A. Zenati, Paul J. Johnson, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Hyungpil Moon, Brett Zubiate, Carlos M. Rivera‐Serrano, Nabil Simaan and Andrea Bajo. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, The International Journal of Robotics Research, Research Showcase @ Carnegie Mellon University (Carnegie Mellon University) and Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact