Stephen Moore

716 total citations
9 papers, 567 citations indexed

About

Stephen Moore is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Moore has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 567 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Organic Chemistry and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Stephen Moore's work include Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (3 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers) and Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers). Stephen Moore is often cited by papers focused on Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (3 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers) and Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers). Stephen Moore collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Stephen Moore's co-authors include Graeme C.M. Smith, Aaron Cranston, Frank Kerrigan, Niall M.B. Martin, Keith Menear, Sylvie Gomez, Charlotte Knights, Alan Lau, Xiaoling Cockcroft and Ian T.W. Matthews and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, The American Journal of Surgery and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Moore

9 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Moore United Kingdom 7 381 349 101 92 66 9 567
Ian T.W. Matthews United Kingdom 5 425 1.1× 367 1.1× 104 1.0× 106 1.2× 75 1.1× 9 589
Jamin D. Steffen United States 11 737 1.9× 618 1.8× 59 0.6× 217 2.4× 161 2.4× 16 975
E. Wahlberg Sweden 8 390 1.0× 392 1.1× 26 0.3× 83 0.9× 136 2.1× 10 670
T. Ekblad Sweden 15 807 2.1× 685 2.0× 111 1.1× 222 2.4× 233 3.5× 17 1.2k
E. Kouznetsova Sweden 2 307 0.8× 223 0.6× 18 0.2× 81 0.9× 95 1.4× 2 391
James R. Hitchin United Kingdom 11 189 0.5× 848 2.4× 70 0.7× 11 0.1× 91 1.4× 19 1.0k
Cristina Mayor‐Ruiz Spain 12 374 1.0× 849 2.4× 64 0.6× 18 0.2× 19 0.3× 20 953
Jean Husten United States 11 123 0.3× 180 0.5× 90 0.9× 21 0.2× 39 0.6× 23 337
Liton Kumar Saha United States 12 269 0.7× 469 1.3× 35 0.3× 12 0.1× 17 0.3× 23 523
Georgina W. Sikorski United States 8 408 1.1× 633 1.8× 41 0.4× 12 0.1× 86 1.3× 10 800

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Moore. The network helps show where Stephen Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Moore. Stephen Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Yusuf, Gibran, Vasileios Rafailidis, Stephen Moore, et al.. (2020). The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of scrotal trauma: a review. Insights into Imaging. 11(1). 68–68. 10 indexed citations
2.
Moore, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound to guide a successful biopsy of a splenic sarcomatoid carcinoma. Ultrasound. 28(1). 58–61. 3 indexed citations
3.
Moore, Stephen, et al.. (2018). Percutaneous drainage of a parotid gland abscess under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance: A case report. Ultrasound. 26(3). 182–186. 8 indexed citations
4.
Chapron, Christopher, Rebecca Glen, Massimiliano La Colla, et al.. (2014). Synthesis of 2′-O,4′-C-alkylene-bridged ribonucleosides and their evaluation as inhibitors of HCV NS5B polymerase. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 24(12). 2699–2702. 10 indexed citations
5.
Morriello, Gregori J., Sander G. Mills, Mikhail Reibarkh, et al.. (2010). Substituted fused bicyclic pyrrolizinones as potent, orally bioavailable hNK1 antagonists. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 20(6). 2007–2012. 8 indexed citations
6.
Menear, Keith, Xiaoling Cockcroft, Aaron Cranston, et al.. (2008). 4-[3-(4-Cyclopropanecarbonylpiperazine-1-carbonyl)-4-fluorobenzyl]-2H-phthalazin-1-one: A Novel Bioavailable Inhibitor of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 51(20). 6581–6591. 483 indexed citations
7.
Morriello, Gregori J., Robert J. DeVita, Sander G. Mills, et al.. (2007). Fused bicyclic pyrrolizinones as new scaffolds for human NK1 antagonists. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 16(5). 2156–2170. 24 indexed citations
8.
Everett, Steven A., Matthew A. Naylor, Stephen Moore, et al.. (1999). Prodrugs for targeting hypoxic tissues: Regiospecific elimination of aspirin from reduced indolequinones. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 9(1). 113–118. 20 indexed citations
9.
Holder, Douglas, et al.. (1970). Spleen effluent manipulations. The American Journal of Surgery. 119(3). 269–274. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026